To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 26798
26797  |  26799
Subject: 
Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 5 May 2005 16:22:00 GMT
Viewed: 
1056 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:

snip

You snipped the more important stuff I think.

  
   I agree!

   Put the power (nuclear or otherwise) in the hands of the people.

That too. I think the second admendment goes up to personal tanks in applicability...

The thing is I’m not sure if you’re serious or not,

Why aren’t you sure???? I said it here before, wasn’t kidding then, wasn’t this time either.

   but that’s irrelevant--I know ‘Mericans that are serious about that statement and for that, I thank God every day that I’m Canadian.

To each his own. I won’t say that there might be wags on this side of the line saying the same thing about your citizenship... because sometimes I wish you were ‘murrican...

   Have fun stormin’ the castle

No doubt. Especially without any weapons.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant)
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote: <snip> (...) The thing is I'm not sure if you're serious or not, but that's irrelevant--I know 'Mericans that are serious about that statement and for that, I thank God every day that I'm Canadian. (...) (20 years ago, 5-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

29 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR