Debate : 26795


Off-Topic / Debate / 26795	26794 \| 26796

Subject:	Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Thu, 5 May 2005 14:37:00 GMT
Viewed:	962 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:

snip

I agree!

Put the power (nuclear or otherwise) in the hands of the people.

That too. I think the second admendment goes up to personal tanks in applicability...

The thing is I’m not sure if you’re serious or not, but that’s irrelevant--I know ‘Mericans that are serious about that statement and for that, I thank God every day that I’m Canadian.

Have fun stormin’ the castle

Dave K

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant)
(...) You snipped the more important stuff I think. (...) Why aren't you sure???? I said it here before, wasn't kidding then, wasn't this time either. (...) To each his own. I won't say that there might be wags on this side of the line saying the (...) (19 years ago, 5-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant)
(...) Richard is right as far as he goes, where he falls down is in his prescription for how to change countries to be free... (...) You mean like the US??? (...) You mean like Dubya ??? (...) I agree! (...) That too. I think the second admendment (...) (19 years ago, 5-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

29 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search