Subject:
|
Re: Victories for smokefree ballot initiatives
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Nov 2004 02:36:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1255 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tim Courtney wrote:
> > If you dig up articles on smokefree.net, you should find that in any case,
> > business goes up with a total ban.
>
> I wouldn't be suprised. I think if I were in the government's shoes, I wouldn't
> have a total BAN on smoking, because I'd say it's up to the establishment and
> its employees to make that decision, but I would do my best to ENCOURAGE
> smoke-free establishments. Perhaps put a tax on businesses that allow smoking,
> or a tax break on businesses that are smoke-free. Or both.
I await the day when the concept of smoking is only remembered in the history
books. Not likely to happen in my lifetime, though.
In the mean time, whatever I can do to clear the air, making it safer for me and
others, I'll do.
-Tim
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Victories for smokefree ballot initiatives
|
| (...) I await the day when the concept of smoking american guns all around the world is only remembered in the history books. with a paranoid nation which has just confirmed its paranoic government it's not likely to happen in my lifetime, though. (...) (20 years ago, 11-Nov-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Victories for smokefree ballot initiatives
|
| (...) Kind of a tricky line to walk. I mean, getting a job as a stunt man you're subjected to physical danger and harm. Working as a stripper will almost guarantee what (in other industries) would easily be construed as sexual harassment from (...) (20 years ago, 8-Nov-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
