To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 2292
2291  |  2293
Subject: 
Re: Art? (was Re: LEGO as Art)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 30 Sep 1999 10:35:40 GMT
Viewed: 
297 times
  
John Neal wrote in message <37F305FB.3B2896F5@uswest.net>...

I got into a big debate in RTL a while back regarding the piece of "art"
entitled "LEGODEATH" and what constituted Art and I'm not particularily
interested in starting another, but I will say that I *seriously* question • the
use of LEGO as the medium for Libera's work.  It's a toy for God's sake; • what
does it have (seriously) to do with the Holocaust?  And if it doesn't have
anything to do with it, then why in hell use it?!  What next?  Minifig • porn?  To
me, He *trivializes* the Holocaust.  If you want to be impacted by the
Holocaust, go to Yad Vashem in Tel Aviv or at the least see Steven • Spielberg's
brilliant Shindler's List.  They will make you more than think; they will • make
you cry.  All Libera did was shock me into wondering what kind of an idiot • would
construct such an exhibit.

-John

I don't know whether anyone can truly say what is and isn't "art", but I
strongly agree with the idea that Lego was the wrong medium for this
exhibit. It's all fine and well to try and give the Holocaust certain
connotations due to the use of Lego, but it's going to work the other way as
well, and (as was pointed out in the article) had real repercussions for TLG
who have worked so hard to maintain a certain image of their toy.
Frankly, it offended me because it was such an injustice to the image that
the toy has for me. With even an ounce of sensitivity OR common sense this
artist could have stuck to conveying his "message" effectively with the more
generic types of toy.
Can any artist simply be excused from the consequences of creating his/her
"art" simply because it's "art"? Is "art" really a license to be
irresponsible?

Paul



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Art? (was Re: LEGO as Art)
 
(...) hello, y'all ~ i just posted to RTL yesterday my belief that LEGO is ART... and then i see this thread. i have been an artist my entire life, starting private classes at 12, figure drawing at 16, began working professionally at 19, and now on (...) (25 years ago, 30-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Art? (was Re: LEGO as Art)
 
(...) I got into a big debate in RTL a while back regarding the piece of "art" entitled "LEGODEATH" and what constituted Art and I'm not particularily interested in starting another, but I will say that I *seriously* question the use of LEGO as the (...) (25 years ago, 30-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)

18 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR