Subject:
|
Re: Free Speech, again
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:37:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
599 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > > And who doesn't advocate free pudding?
> > >
> > > Me. Who's going to pay for it??? There are no free goods, you know that
> > > already, Dave!
> >
> > I think sacrosanct expression is put forth as TAANSTFL, but pudding in my
> > world model is a dessert, not a lunch.
>
> Technically: TANSTAAFL (there aint no such thing as a free lunch) and
> desserts form part of lunch. At least around here they do.
Wow--both my spelling and acronymism have been off lately. Too much
pudding (which are part of dinner, not lunch, around here).
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
46 Messages in This Thread:
  
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
