Subject:
|
Re: Free Speech, again
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 20:22:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
351 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > > http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/04/23/scotus.free.speech.ap/index.html
> >
> > > > I am as big a proponent of free speech as anyone I know,
> >
> > > Well, maybe not.
> >
> > ??
> You know me, right? Therefore I am in the set of "anyone I know". And (the
> rest of) my post showed that I'm a bigger proponent of free speech than you are.
I don't buy your application of free speech in that post, though. You
might as well have said "I advocate a second helping of pudding for
everyone, therefore I'm a greater advocate of free speech."
Dave!
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Free Speech, again
|
| (...) If I get pudding out of the deal, I'm with Larry. Canada has no 1st ammendment clause, iirc, but somehow my freedom of speech doesn't seem to be limited. Do we actually need a specific clause outlining the necessity of freedom of speech, or (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Free Speech, again
|
| (...) Well you shouldn't have snipped it without comment, then. Snipping stuff around here tends to mean you agree, ne? (not always but of course...) (...) Wouldn't that be a "greater advocate of free pudding"? (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Free Speech, again
|
| (...) You know me, right? Therefore I am in the set of "anyone I know". And (the rest of) my post showed that I'm a bigger proponent of free speech than you are. QED. (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
46 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
