To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 20558
    For Sean... —David Koudys
   The Leafs lost!!!!!!!! Game 7! How could they do this to me!!! Well, the Canucks are still in--that's a good thing. Well Pat, Dougie, Sundin (et al)... Hasta La Vista until next year--go hit the golf greens... Dave K -who, if he was a hockey fan, (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
   
        Re: For Sean... —John Neal
     (...) The Wild won!!!...!!! (...) Game 7! How could they do this period????? (...) Lessee, who is next for my Wild (Man I hate team names that aren't plurals:-/)... the Canucks! >;^D (...) Wanna make a friendly US-Canadian wager? :-) JOHN (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
    
         Re: For Sean... —David Koudys
      (...) Again, if I were a hockey fan I might know fer sure who was still innit. I grew up in a sea of hockey fans so all my info is thru them. I think the Sens are still in and I know the Canucks are. So Vancouver or Ottawa--two teams i don't have (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
     
          Re: For Sean... —Sean Devolites
      (...) Ottawas a good one. They played well even when they weren't being payed at all. Now thats cool. (...) Dallas Stars to be exact. Yea, that would be cool, but id love to see the Ducks vs. Wild. (...) Yep. (...) Hasta la Vista, Sean (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
    
         Re: For Sean... —Sean Devolites
      (...) YEA! (...) Good question. This surprised me just as much as the ducks...THE DUCKS, beating the red wings. Im tellin ya, its the year of the underdog. (...) I wish the capitals were still in it, a home team to go for. But no, they had to blow a (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
    
         Re: For Sean... —Ryan Wilhelm
     Hey all- Speaking as an ex-Minnesotan, GO WILD!! GO WILD!! Ry out (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
    
         Re: For Sean... —Kyle McDonald
     Actually aren't there a ton of topics to debate in sports? How about: The pros and cons of the designated hitter? Whether or not lowering the pitchers mound has given batters an advantage? The pros/cons of Instant replay in the NFL? The Tuck rule? (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
    
         Re: For Sean... —Bruce Schlickbernd
     (...) Real baseball players stand out in the field. Reggie Jackson would turn trying to catch even the simpliest routine fly ball into an adventure. (...) Give the batters a mound - we have a mound gap! (...) First incarnation was terrible, the (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
    
         Re: For Sean... —Jason Maxwell
     (...) Real baseball players bat. Mark Mulder turns swinging a bat into an adventure. In other words, the DH is as legit as AL pitching and/or relief pitching. BTW Edgar Martinez for the Hall of Fame (Once he retires)! (...) Agreed. (...) Legit call (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
    
         Re: For Sean... —Pedro Silva
     (...) Worse than that: it's too prone to mistakes. It'd be good if instant replay systems were introduced for the 4th referee, so he could assist the main referee on the more dubious cases. Then again, the mistakes are also part of the game... :-/ (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
    
         Re: For Sean... —Sean Devolites
     (...) Another thing about instant replay, its' annoying when they spend so long on what seems like a simple call. No ordering pizzas. Another thing is they need to make some rules simpler. The tuck rule i beleive is the one which helped the Patriots (...) (22 years ago, 26-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
   
        Re: For Sean... —Pedro Silva
     (...) For some european news as well (not that I expect anyone but Kevin Cheng to care... ;-) www.uefa.com UEFA Champins League quarterfinals, 2nd round: Barcelona 1, JUVENTUS 2 (agg. 2-3) Valencia 2, INTER 1 (agg. 2-2) Man. United 4, REAL MADRID 3 (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
    
         Re: For Sean... —Sean Devolites
     (...) Hey, tis sports my friend. (...) agg? Havn't heard that for awhile. Anyways, they all look to be close matches. (...) I'm guessing they come on ESPN early in the morning? I might wake up that early, doubt it though. (...) Hasta la Vista, Sean (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
    
         Re: For Sean... —Pedro Silva
     (...) "Aggregate" result from the two rounds. At least I think that's the word... but feel free to correct me on this. (...) Indeed they were; ManUtd vs. Real Madrid was one of the most disputed matches I've seen in recent years - it's as good as it (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
    
         Sports scores redux( Re: For Sean... —Larry Pieniazek
      (...) <snip> When did this become off-topic.sports? :-) Maybe these footie scores (or whatever they are) belong in off-topic.fun, if anywhere? Call me grumpy (the tiggers are 1 and 18 or something ridiculous, and the Wings got eliminated in 4 (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
     
          Re: Sports scores redux( Re: For Sean... —Pedro Silva
       (...) I just carried on with the thread... :-) (...) Ouch! That hurt! :-P But yes, you have a point. I suppose o-t.d isn't the proper place for them... it's not a topic that "fits in" with the rest. (...) Who told you I don't participate in soccer? (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
     
          Re: Sports scores redux( Re: For Sean... —Sean Devolites
      (...) Back when it changed from off-topic.debate. (...) Possibly... But they could be debates... (...) HA! THE DUCKS SWEPT THE RED WINGS! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! oops, sorry, that slipped out there ; ) (...) Well, im fundamentally different then. Probably (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
     
          Re: Sports scores redux( Re: For Sean... —Dave Schuler
      (...) Actually, you've identified the primary problem with the US population at the moment. Dave! (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
    
         Re: For Sean... —Sean Devolites
     (...) I'll take your word for it. (...) I heard that one on sportscenter. Short clip, but ManUtd won right? (...) Nice. Lemme see, 3 o clock, nope, im at school still, from those freakin extended hours. I'm in middle school and am stuck there from 7 (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
    
         Re: For Sean... —Pedro Silva
     (...) Yes, they did win the match; but they lost the round (the first leg result was 3-1 for Real Madrid) (...) For future reference: Video! :-P (advantage: you can forward the boring parts of the match...) (...) They're being so underpaid compared (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
   
        Re: For Sean... —Sean Devolites
   (...) Yea. Well, I dunno how the Leafs could make it 7 games and then choke it 6-1. I mean, its odd. I'm cool tho, the Wild won (Imagine if it was the Wild vs. Ducks in the Finals) It's like a year of the underdogs or something. It's almost as if (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR