Subject:
|
Re: ? (Shooting the messenger)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 20 Feb 2002 06:48:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
371 times
|
| |
|
|
Why’d I leave the post in .general & .admin?
Honestly, because a general-community outline is needed for these type of
situations. We’re the ones that’ll likely encounter these incidents first,
so we should have some measures in place. Because they’ll invariably
reappear eventually in some form or another. And we should have some form of
protocol to deal with it.
I did my best with to help with the limited knowledge and resources that I had.
(I just rang the alert bell, but now I know what to do in the future!)
Perhaps someday our community will have these procedures in place.
And perhaps then I'll enjoy the experience here as I once did…
Sincerely,
--==RiçhärÐ==--
bye
In lugnet.general, Richard Noeckel writes:
> In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > In lugnet.general, Richard Noeckel writes:
> > > ?
>
> <snip>
>
> > >
> > > Why...
> >
> > Yes, why indeed...
> >
> > I would posit that you would have served the entire community a lot better
> > by dropping a note to Kevin about this pic instead of posting a link to it
> > to ***.GENERAL***, for goodness sake, with nary a word of warning that it's
> > inappropriate.
> >
> > C'mon Richard, show a little common sense, will you?
>
> I did what I could to make a bad situation better.
> I didn't know what else to do but knew that resolution was needed.
> I just wanted to find help, and didn't know how else to do it.
>
> Seemed like the best "common sense" at that time...
>
> <To "all" except LFB>
> But what's the sense in re-posting the link?
> What's the sense in leaving the conversation in general.
> What's the sense in creating a provocative title to draw attention?
> (I posted there for "general" help... why did y'all post
> here and not in off-topic?)
> What's the sense in discussing the issue here,
> I don't spam-block my e-mail, anyone can reach me!
> (For people speak about "what's best for the community,"
> well privately e-mailing me to discuss options would have
> been far more productive)
>
> I'll just be going away now, sorry to have bothered y'all with this!
>
> it'll be awhile,
>
> --==Richard==--
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: ? ... (Shooting the messenger)
|
| (...) I can leave everything else alone (cause others have already summed up my view) except this. Posting a link of vulgar pornographic content DOES NOT EVER belong on LUGNET. Its along the same lines of posting vulgar words in the .general group, (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: ? ... (Shooting the messenger)
|
| (...) However, what's posted on Brickshelf is nothing to do with Lugnet. Kevin's the admin of Brickshelf, his email is publically available, he generally acts fairly quickly to issues re protocol on his sight - look at how fast the avatar "problem" (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | ? ... (Shooting the messenger)
|
| (...) <snip> (...) I did what I could to make a bad situation better. I didn't know what else to do but knew that resolution was needed. I just wanted to find help, and didn't know how else to do it. Seemed like the best "common sense" at that (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
