To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 35708
35707  |  35709
Subject: 
Re: ?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 20 Feb 2002 05:34:00 GMT
Viewed: 
779 times
  
Please argue privately, or at least move to off-topic debate.

And, thank you for NOT reposting the URL via quote. others please take note.

-Suz

In lugnet.general, Richard Noeckel writes:
I just asked why…
T’was simply a question on the reasoning behind such a creation.

In lugnet.general, Sarah Mather writes:
How sad that you had to post this link... If you ignore the morons, they
will go away.

But if people continually post the links to the trash posted on
Brickshelf, then the people get EXACTLY what they want... fame.

And surely your comments only exasperate the situation!

I posted for purposes of resolution…
For administrators action…
And for clarification on why the individual choose to do this…
(Why did you post… to simply tell me that I shouldn’t have brought this
up?)

I don’t believe in ignoring something when it is wrong,
perhaps you can just walk away and dismiss it, but I require
resolution…and this matter needs to be resolved.

If you ignore the morons, they will go away.

Yah, and hiding from a problem will make it vanish?

                                    -R



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: ?
 
I just asked why… T’was simply a question on the reasoning behind such a creation. (...) And surely your comments only exasperate the situation! I posted for purposes of resolution… For administrators action… And for clarification on why the (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.general)

37 Messages in This Thread:

















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR