| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Alfred Speredelozzi writes:
> Hmm.. this is interesting. Are you saying that you did not write this:
> "Ban him.
>
> Scott A
>
>
> FUT lugent.admin.general
> x-posted to .general, as this is an issue which concerns us all... or at
> least is should."
>
> which can be found here:
> http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=14881
Indeed it is interesting:
1. I set follow-ups to admin.general:
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=14881
2. Tamara replies to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms,
lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general:
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=14882
3. I replied to Tamara's post without noticing the FUT & I apologise:
http://news.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=9758
4. James gives me a hard time for it:
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=14884
So, just what is your point about my post below?
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=14883
Scott A
>
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Brown writes:
> > > Trimmed lugnet.general from the FUT, this is *not* a general discussion, no
> > > matter how much publicity you want:
> > > http://news.lugnet.com/general/?n=1
> >
> > Can you read? Check who set the FUT. It was not I.
> >
> > Scott A
> >
> > >
> > > James
>
> Personally, I think Scott should be banned for one reason. I believe this
> nonsense would stop without him around. I mostly don't pay attention to
> these things, but it seems that this has gotten out of control.
>
> Alternatively, I would suggest that Larry simply ignore this guy. Larry,
> trust me when I tell you there are a lot of posters of interesting info that
> no-one replies to, why not try to avoid getting into debates with this
> person. I am not asking you to change your personality, but it doesn't seem
> worth it to even discuss anything with him.
>
> In fact, we could all start shunning Scott right now, if we want to. That
> is my plan. At any rate after I post this.
>
> -Alfred
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Apology.
|
| Hmm.. this is interesting. Are you saying that you did not write this: "Ban him. Scott A FUT lugent.admin.general x-posted to .general, as this is an issue which concerns us all... or at least is should." (...) Personally, I think Scott should be (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
31 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
