| |
Hmm.. this is interesting. Are you saying that you did not write this:
"Ban him.
Scott A
FUT lugent.admin.general
x-posted to .general, as this is an issue which concerns us all... or at
least is should."
which can be found here:
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=14881
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Brown writes:
> > Trimmed lugnet.general from the FUT, this is *not* a general discussion, no
> > matter how much publicity you want:
> > http://news.lugnet.com/general/?n=1
>
> Can you read? Check who set the FUT. It was not I.
>
> Scott A
>
> >
> > James
Personally, I think Scott should be banned for one reason. I believe this
nonsense would stop without him around. I mostly don't pay attention to
these things, but it seems that this has gotten out of control.
Alternatively, I would suggest that Larry simply ignore this guy. Larry,
trust me when I tell you there are a lot of posters of interesting info that
no-one replies to, why not try to avoid getting into debates with this
person. I am not asking you to change your personality, but it doesn't seem
worth it to even discuss anything with him.
In fact, we could all start shunning Scott right now, if we want to. That
is my plan. At any rate after I post this.
-Alfred
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Apology.
|
| (...) 1. I set follow-ups to admin.general: (URL) Tamara replies to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general: (URL) I replied to Tamara's post without noticing the FUT & I apologise: (URL) James gives me a (...) (23 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
Message is in Reply To:
31 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
