Subject:
|
Re: ...but Japan didn't agree with that assessment.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 2 Nov 2001 01:06:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
272 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
>
> > So we should "go with the flow", accept morals which we as individuals do
> > not agree with? I'm not saying either moral relativism or objectivism is
> > "wrong" or "right", I just think most of us operate in the middle-ground...
> > I may be wrong.
>
> At the same time that I won't accept morality with which I do not agree, I • must
> live in a system in which a common morality has been developed. I don't see
> anything wrong with lots of things that are against the law, so I base my
> activities on a combination of what I want and what the consequences are. Is
> that what you mean by a middle ground? If so, it's not "most of us," it's all
> of us. No one agrees 100% with the body of law under which they live.
And even if they do, it's just a case of the middle ground coinciding with the
law.
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
19 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
