Subject:
|
Re: Okinawa, a foretaste of invading the main islands..
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 23:08:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
142 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> http://www.nationalreview.com/hanson/hanson102901.shtml
>
> I forgot how ferocious the battle for Okinawa actually was... but the real
> point of this article lies elsewhere. Moral relativism is a bankrupt idea.
That may be true, certainly a lot of people hold that opinion. Hanson is just
another of those people. Doesn't prove the assertion, though.
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
19 Messages in This Thread: ![Okinawa, a foretaste of invading the main islands.. -Larry Pieniazek (31-Oct-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![.. but japan was 'beat' by the time the main island was reached. -Scott Arthur (31-Oct-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![...but Japan didn't agree with that assessment. -Lindsay Frederick Braun (31-Oct-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: ...but Japan didn't agree with that assessment. -Scott Arthur (1-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: ...but Japan didn't agree with that assessment. -Christopher L. Weeks (1-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: ...but Japan didn't agree with that assessment. -Ross Crawford (2-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: ...but Japan didn't agree with that assessment. -Scott Arthur (2-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![More on Moral Relativism -Larry Pieniazek (9-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: More on Moral Relativism -David Eaton (9-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: More on Moral Relativism -Ross Crawford (9-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: More on Moral Relativism -David Eaton (9-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: More on Moral Relativism -Larry Pieniazek (9-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: More on Moral Relativism -Ross Crawford (10-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: More on Moral Relativism -Larry Pieniazek (10-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: More on Moral Relativism -Christopher L. Weeks (10-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: More on Moral Relativism -Larry Pieniazek (10-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: More on Moral Relativism -Ross Crawford (10-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: More on Moral Relativism -Scott Arthur (11-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|