To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14584
14583  |  14585
Subject: 
Re: More on Moral Relativism
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 10 Nov 2001 18:28:25 GMT
Viewed: 
352 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:

That said, it's possible to be morally right and yet choose not to act. My
system of morals doesn't require me to go forth and right every evil no
matter how small.

How does your system of morals feel about your actually assisting evil because
to not do so would be painful?

Chris



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: More on Moral Relativism
 
(...) Under duress? Not great. Voluntarily? Really bad. (insofar as a system of morals can have feelings... :-) ) (23 years ago, 10-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: More on Moral Relativism
 
(...) The US has a history of letting things slide until greatly (and sometimes, repeatedly) provoked. You can argue that's not "morally right" (and I'd tend to agree), but it nevertheless is reality. Further, I am not in any way shape or form going (...) (23 years ago, 10-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

19 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR