Subject:
|
Re: ...but Japan didn't agree with that assessment.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 Nov 2001 19:28:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
208 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> So we should "go with the flow", accept morals which we as individuals do
> not agree with? I'm not saying either moral relativism or objectivism is
> "wrong" or "right", I just think most of us operate in the middle-ground...
> I may be wrong.
At the same time that I won't accept morality with which I do not agree, I must
live in a system in which a common morality has been developed. I don't see
anything wrong with lots of things that are against the law, so I base my
activities on a combination of what I want and what the consequences are. Is
that what you mean by a middle ground? If so, it's not "most of us," it's all
of us. No one agrees 100% with the body of law under which they live.
In your case, it does seem that you value the majority opinion on right and
wrong much more than I, or most Americans(?), do. Or did I read that wrong?
Chris
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
19 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
