To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14566
14565  |  14567
Subject: 
Re: More on Moral Relativism
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 9 Nov 2001 22:55:32 GMT
Viewed: 
290 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
http://www.nationalreview.com/hanson/hanson110901.shtml

Please, Mr Hanson, explain to me why that would be worse than several thousand
innocent Americans (and others) dying in a terrorist attack, followed by a
protracted war against enemies unknown?

Heck, I can answer that one... What if there were no terrorist threat?
Should we expel and disallow Nazism and KKK-ism in the US? How about
Communists? What about anti-abortionists? What about Fox, they're often
anti-government. At what point are we cutting off civil liberties to such an
extent that it's unnecessary and detrimental?

Ain't life a bitch?

Maybe according to Fox News.

DaveE



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: More on Moral Relativism
 
(...) From the article: "Yes, we knew all that, and so are now told that our intelligence agencies are inept, naïve, and worse, for not spotting the hijackers in advance. But we also surely suspect that, had any government watchdog agency swept down (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

19 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR