 | | Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) [snip] (...) [snip] (...) Hmmmm. Robert, you're really starting to sound like someone else who came around here temporarily a while back - what was his name? Matthew Boulton? I'd almost forgotten..... ROSCO (24 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Is Robert Bevens exceedingly obnoxious? (was: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years...))
|
|
In just a few days in lugnet.off-topic.debate, Robert Bevens: (...) Makes unwarranted assumptions about other posters' experience. (...) Is a smart-aleck about it. Also: Ignores substantive point on how annoying tit-for-tat arguments are. (...) (...) (24 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is religion so hot?
|
|
(...) Good point about separating religious beliefs and the rest of one's being. While I don't think I have changed my religious views based on the direct religious debates, I have been convinced to change my views from a whole perspective. I am (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is religion so hot?
|
|
(...) At an offhand guess (because I don't usually partake in other online interfaces that are this open-ended [since we're lucky enough to have the off-topic newsgroup]), I think it's no more prevalant here than it would be elsewhere. Personally, I (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God have a name for God?
|
|
(...) Oh goody. This debate is over. Next debate please... (24 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
|
|
(...) Uh, I hate to point out your hypocristy...but on the one hand you say it's easy to go back through the previous messages in the thread, and yet you add spaces to the subject line which as you know breaks the thread apart. Not only that but (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God have a name for God?
|
|
(...) Another thing here is competency. I mean take Hitler for example, was he evil? Maybe, maybe not. I would call Hitler evil he mercilessly had 6 million Jewish people slaughtered not because he actually thought they were the bane of the arian (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God have a name for God?
|
|
(...) Hmmm. Good point. Which raises the question: is a thing evil by nature or by action? If someone were evil by actions, then I could see the possibility of good. If someone were evil by nature, then that person has a heckuva lot of work to do to (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God have a name for God?
|
|
(...) If we're splitting hairs, couldn't something inherently (ie: predisposed to) evil still make the moral choice not to commit evil? Dave! (24 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God have a name for God?
|
|
(...) Just a nit to pick: wouldn't being a sinner imply that you have some capacity for good? IOW, unless EVERY act and thought you commit is a sin, then you have some amount of good, right? How could something inherently evil have good in it? (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is religion so hot?
|
|
(...) Because doing so has affected my beliefs. First, understand that you can't just say "this is religion, and this is everything else I believe in". It's all part of one's belief system, ethics system, political system, etc. Religious beliefs (or (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is religion so hot?
|
|
(...) This is a valid question. For those of us confident of our views (which is probably everyone here!), it serves as a place to practice articulating those views so that we may ultimately discuss them more rationally. In addition, we learn the (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is religion so hot?
|
|
(...) I've kind of cooled on the religion debates myself, to the extent that i really don't participate any longer. I think they are somewhat appropriate though, because religious or non-religious sentiment are very real angles of who we all are, (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Why is religion so hot?
|
|
Since this is the place the debates about religion happen (or at least should happen :-) I am gonna post this here... Why do you think is religion such a hot topic (no pun intended) of debate on a website dedicated to LEGO? I find it hard to believe (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien races
|
|
(...) Science indeed deals with observable phenomena, but it deals also with phenomena that can be observed indirectly, be it through a particle accelerator or through an examination of the fossil record. Just so I'm clear on your views, how old do (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien races
|
|
Dave Schuler: (...) subject (...) Don't worry, it's not as complicated as I thought it would be... (...) Oh, yes, good point. I hadn't thought of that. Now the Biblical argument. I will have several premises and then a couple questions, assuming for (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien races
|
|
(...) True. It was written over about three thousand years before Him, and during the first century after Him. And in those texts written before Him were hundreds of prophecies about His life which He fulfilled. (...) Only a few hundred years after (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God have a name for God?
|
|
(...) Well, no one asked Jesus to die for us. As you said, Robert, we each deserve to die for our own sins. God could have let us all die and not sent His Son. But God is a *loving* God, and he wanted us to be able to live with Him forever in (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Man in God's image
|
|
Daniel Jassim wrote: [snip] (...) Our ability to advance, learn, create, and invent are reflections of the Creator, but aggressiveness, territorial-ness, and brutality are not. They came about because the first man, Adam, disobeyed the one command (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien races
|
|
(...) Ha! Try telling that to the little green guys! I like Stephen Hawking's take on alien life: He essentially says that if there are other intelligent beings out there, then we should keep our heads down and hope they don't notice us, for exactly (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
