 | | Re: blowharding (was: Re: No promises when I'll be done, but...)
|
|
(...) Well said Larry. You are very right about me not making sense. My apology to the group. Obviously my frustration was at a boiling point. (...) Agreed. Bryce McGlone (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: blowharding (was: Re: No promises when I'll be done, but...)
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bryce McGlone writes: <snip> Attacking Matt at this point, after he's been banned and can't even respond (not that we want him to) probably doesn't make a lot of sense. While your venting is understandable, at this point (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: blowharding (was: Re: No promises when I'll be done, but...)
|
|
(...) IMHO, no, you didn't fail; you've been quite measured and careful throughout. For our protagonist to claim the high ground of "civility" at this late juncture is analogous to expecting an apology to atone for, say, running over some- one's dog (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: My point.
|
|
(...) D'oh! I forgot my own footnote. [1] I was there to flame. I enjoy flaming people. I don't think it's a big crime, especially if you keep it to places where it's appropriate, such as alt.usenet.kooks, alt.flame, ne.internet.services (circa (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My point.
|
|
(...) AUK is defintely alt.usenet.kooks. I have spent some time there myself, it is definitely a flame group. The entire purpose of the group is to ridicule, well, "usenet kooks". People that post there generally get there in one of two ways- either (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: No promises when I'll be done, but...
|
|
(...) I can feel the same way with you. Completely. I'm also agreeing with you on your first choice..:-) Actually I can't express myself well since I don't know enough offensive words in English. But Jonathan Wilson is completely out of subject here (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: My point.
|
|
(...) Fells like that? whoa... Thank you Todd, I feel like you shouldn't wait this much..:-) I personally believe that if I can't find anything to say for an individual's behavior other than "what kind of an *** **** are you?" (I know much better (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: J.W. (Was Re: No promises when I'll be done, but...)
|
|
(...) I'd go farther than "giving him a chance", actually. I see him as a solid contributor to LUGNET and to the LCAD community at this point. (winning the model of the month with that absolutely STUNNING shell station really solidified the CAD (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: J.W. (Was Re: No promises when I'll be done, but...)
|
|
(...) Me too. --Todd (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: blowharding (was: Re: No promises when I'll be done, but...)
|
|
(...) <emphasis mine> (...) Clever, that, posting the MOST inflammatory stuff somewhere else instead of here, and just giving a link from here to there. Very clever skirting of the ToS indeed. ++Lar (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: J.W. (Was Re: No promises when I'll be done, but...)
|
|
(...) Don't kill yourself Todd. Though you feel it was inappropriate, and it might well have been, we don't need to be bringing up old beans after this. Lets all take a breather and save examining our past here for another rainy day. I, at least, (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: J.W. (Was Re: No promises when I'll be done, but...)
|
|
(...) I apologize to the L-CAD community for posting that publicly. It should have been a private e-mail. --Todd (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: blowharding (was: Re: No promises when I'll be done, but...)
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Jeez, I know that by now he's been banned, but: I fully admit to telling him he should grow up and not be so rude, but he makes it sound like I ran over his dog or something. I tried very hard today to attack the -behavior- and (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: My point.
|
|
(...) AUK = alt.usenet.kooks, in my 'net experience. it's a newsgroup used mostly for flaming/trolling, and it's where people like Matthew end up. some of the regulars there are bad news. (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | J.W. (Was Re: No promises when I'll be done, but...)
|
|
Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) crap (...) J.W. - Would you, perchance, be referring to one Jonathan Wilson? If so, then while we're on the subject of unrepentant rudeness, would someone please care to direct me to the public apology made (...) (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: My point.
|
|
(...) alt.usenet.kooks? (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My point.
|
|
(...) Matthew's posting privileges are now disabled (to all groups) after the past round of abusive messages he posted. Lord knows if he's the same person who identified himself/herself at "Madhatter" in RTL last year, but there's been plenty enough (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My point.
|
|
(...) Matthew, darlin, get a grip. I'm sorry, but you do realize that it was *obviously* not just what you said to Jude that got everyone here riled up. You said yourself that you made up that whole discussion on your site. That it's not your (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: This sums it up
|
|
Just my two bits ..... A while back, I taught metaphysics class on AOL( yea yea lame but I had to start somewhere <G>) anyway, these chat rooms are open to the aol public and folks would take it upon themselves to stop in and disrupt the class to (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
