 | | Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
(...) I would argue (we're x-posted to .debate now), that if anything TV should not be held as a standard for what should and shouldn't be done on LUGNET. By nature, TV is ratings hungry.. and if they think they can grab a few more seconds of (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
(...) Purely a question of curiosity, what does "geeting the irrits" mean? Is it a OZism? I can guess from context and I ask because it seems a neat phrase. ++Lar (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans of jan. British LEGO magazine , About the Lego Logo!!!
|
|
Michael Edwards <medwards@ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message news:Fs6DAB.5xx@lugnet.com... (...) may (...) I'd be more worried about obtaining permission to host complete scans of the magazine rather than whether to blue-out the logo or not. Huw (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
(...) Ya. I'll give your post an 80, it's got a good beat and you can dance to it. Seriously, on the main issue, is there anyone who doesn't already know what everyone's position is? The side issues(1) are somewhat interesting if we can get to (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
(...) This would be perfectly on-topic for .market.theory, BTW, as long as it's about TLC and how it affects the market and vice-versa. If it gets into more screaming and name-calling and away from LEGO then it's probably better in (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
"Richard Franks" <spontificus@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Fs6x33.FyG@lugnet.com... (...) I think this should just end. The whole thing is going nowhere fast. I think everyone made some valid points when this all started, now all that is (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
(...) Somewhere in the deep dark dank depths of .debate... hopefully :) Richard (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans of jan. British LEGO magazine , About the Lego Logo!!!
|
|
(...) Well I'll try to be more constructive this time :) I think Huw is right - cropping the LEGO logo and using it arbitarily on your page is a bit like designing your own car, and putting Rolls Royce badges on it? Scanning published content is (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans of jan. British LEGO magazine , About the Lego Logo!!!
|
|
Hi Great a blue block I am starting to get a bit worried now, the Legofair page on Lego says the logo's must not be shown, Now Huw suggest it may applies to standalone logo's but not pictures with the logo on it, say like a manual Would it be ok if (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
(...) Richard raises an interesting point, one which I hope the advent of LEGO Direct will adequately address. I've been geeting the irrits reading this particular debate (why hasn't it moved to .off-topic.debate yet?) with you guys complaining (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate) !
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
(...) You have GOT to be the #1 jerk of Lugnet for the above comment. I bought ZERO of them. But you know what? I could have bought them all, and you'd have ZERO reason to whine. Why? Because you could have called in, just like me. I live in CA, (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
(...) Yes. I sometimes (ok, often) find myself across the fence from Larry, because we have some differences of opinion at very fundemental levels. However, he rarely blows his top, is invariably fair (if opinionated), and cannot be remotely accused (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
(...) Agreed. Granted, Larry is -- by his admission -- selfish, profit-driven, and a big spender. But he is most certainly not obnoxious. He is easily amongst the most polite, professional, and generous (1) people I have ever had business with. His (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
I know this is yesterday's squabble, but I'm just now reading it, and moving my reply to .o-t.d. (...) I don't know Larry, have never met him, but this is not the impression I'm getting of him. The only impression I'm getting from reading this (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Perspective (Was:Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!))
|
|
(...) Second that. This is not appropriate for LUGNET. Arguements of this nature belong in other places. This is an abuse of freedom of speech and not what most of us pay membership dues for. Play well, and respect your peers please. Aaron (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Perspective (Was:Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!))
|
|
(...) Please don't feel sorry for me - *I* am perfectly capable of making myself understood without resorting to certain words. Also, please understand that my disappointment is not in the words used (fairly trivial for everyday conversation), but (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Insider Trading (Was: Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!))
|
|
(...) I admittedly know very little about stock market stuff, so this is mean in the spirit of innocence - my flame proof suit is at the dry-cleaners.. I've just become curious about this "insider trading" law thingy - has the market ever operated (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate) !
|
| |
| | Re: Ad hominem attacks
|
|
(...) Can't (...) Oh alright. You can probably find some politicians untainted by the process somewhere. You were supposed to laugh, not argue! :-) Again I'd point to the LP track record (if I just could dig it (...) And you'll kindly notice that I (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Ad hominem attacks
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: Liberal, conservative, democrat, republican: They are all politicians. Can't (...) Hmm... *L*ibertarian *P*arty... *L*arry *P*ieniazek... Interesting... 8^) Dave! (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wench as a word
|
|
(...) You are correct, sir! ++Lar (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
