To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *25706 (-20)
  Re: Lavender Brick Society
 
(...) Ummm....well...what can I say, I've always had weakness for red-heads, and to be fair, Sandlin's sexual appeal crosses all gender boundaries. -Keith (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)
 
  Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
 
(...) Read below. (...) No, no, not at all. My secret suspicion was that you could never worship any kind of god. I think I was correct by your responses below... (...) Never said worship was required. Besides, if it is your ideal God, then He (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Lavender Brick Society
 
(...) Yeah I did a MOC a few years ago: (2 URLs) And for the record, I'm not gay - I personally find this whole discussion rather silly, and disappointed it's on LUGNET. Seems about as pertinent as my suggesting there be a NWGWDAG (nerdy white guys (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Lavender Brick Society
 
(...) This is "staunch"? (URL) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)
 
  Re: Lavender Brick Society
 
(...) Teddy, I thought Belville was the Gay newsgroup? Wait a minute...Gays have the power of invisibility?! Cooool. As a man with a record of staunch heterosexuality...well...except for that junior-high towell snapping incident that got out of (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)
 
  Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
 
(...) Are you suggesting that having drawn spiritual support on 9-11-2001, as millions of Christians did [1], from a God who is coincidentally shared with two other major religions essentially means they supported the terrorist attacks? Wow, (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Microsoft and IBM in secret plot?
 
(...) How about this-- I didn't write it on Sept 11th (in my time zone), so your point is moot AFAIAC JOHN (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Fair and Balanced, as always.
 
(...) How can it? CBS refuses to release it for scrutiny! And besides, they only have photocopies... (...) Did they even check the veracity of the memos? Their supposed "expert" is even distancing himself from them! It's hack journalism at best. (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Fair and Balanced, as always.
 
(...) Not so much an attack as a rib. Why defend a sinking, stinking, garbage barge? (...) I wish I were! It appears to be the easiest job around these days;-) JOHN (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Lavender Brick Society
 
(...) The Village People are gay!? (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Lavender Brick Society
 
(...) That was never really a concern to me. Nothing in the original post stated that as an intention, nor did I assume it would be. (...) Indeed. I never really thought of it as something relevant to the art of building with Lego. True it may (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Fair and Balanced, as always.
 
"Dave Schuler" <orrex@excite.com> wrote in message news:I43pKt.LII@lugnet.com... (...) Bah! At least they're ever mentioned by the media either one. Show me a single poll by a major news outlet that lists a "third party" candidate as an option. (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Lavender Brick Society
 
(...) why, oh why do we always have to have a "gay side" to everything in society? isn't it enough that we see homosexuality in all forms of media on a daily basis? how does anyone corellate sexual orientation with lego building? it doesn't make (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org) ! 
 
  Re: Lavender Brick Society
 
(...) I agree with you Allister. If there was a gay newsgroup on LUGNET, and someone posted sexual material (of whatever preference), then that would be in violation of the TOS. But if people posting to a gay LUGNET newsgroup never mentioned (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Microsoft and IBM in secret plot?
 
(...) No, but as far as I'm concerned you still haven't properly addressed that ill timed and extremely insensitive (URL) worthless> comment. (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Fair and Balanced, as always.
 
(...) You edited out everything but what was convenient to your attack and you think you won't be called on it? You missed your calling, John, you should be heading the election to re-elect Bush. :-) -->Bruce<-- (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Microsoft and IBM in secret plot?
 
(...) Ideaology. People don't want to believe that their candidate can do any wrong because the alternative is electing a guy that they disagree with. So, they stick their head in the sand, and pretend like these things aren't fundamental flaws that (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Fair and Balanced, as always.
 
(...) Well, I beg your pardon, but has the document been proven to be a forgery? And, if so, has CBS been shown to have had foreknowledge that it was forged? No? Then it's not at all inaccurate to refer to it as a "possibly incorrect aspect of a (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Microsoft and IBM in secret plot?
 
(...) ROTFLMAO! Oops. Am I going to get into acro-trouble again??? :-) JOHN (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Fair and Balanced, as always.
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote: (snip) (...) A "possibly incorrect aspect of a news story"? You missed your calling, Dave!-- you shoulda been a whirling physician:-) JOHN (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR