Subject:
|
Re: Fair and Balanced, as always.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 21:52:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1066 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
(snip)
| |
campaign calling for the retraction of a news story and the release
of source-names because of a possibly incorrect aspect of a news story about
Bush?
|
A “possibly incorrect aspect of a news story”? You missed your calling,
Dave!-- you shoulda been a whirling physician:-)
|
Well, I beg your pardon, but has the document been proven to be a forgery? And,
if so, has CBS been shown to have had foreknowledge that it was forged? No?
Then it’s not at all inaccurate to refer to it as a “possibly incorrect aspect
of a news story,” since the story dealt with a lot of evidence beyond the memo.
What do you think should be done about scumbag Novak, by the way?
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Fair and Balanced, as always.
|
| (...) How can it? CBS refuses to release it for scrutiny! And besides, they only have photocopies... (...) Did they even check the veracity of the memos? Their supposed "expert" is even distancing himself from them! It's hack journalism at best. (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
