To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 25691
25690  |  25692
Subject: 
Re: Fair and Balanced, as always.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 16 Sep 2004 00:14:03 GMT
Viewed: 
1053 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:

(snip)
   campaign calling for the retraction of a news story and the release of source-names because of a possibly incorrect aspect of a news story about Bush?

A “possibly incorrect aspect of a news story”? You missed your calling, Dave!-- you shoulda been a whirling physician:-)

JOHN

You edited out everything but what was convenient to your attack and you think you won’t be called on it? You missed your calling, John, you should be heading the election to re-elect Bush. :-)


-->Bruce<--



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Fair and Balanced, as always.
 
(...) Not so much an attack as a rib. Why defend a sinking, stinking, garbage barge? (...) I wish I were! It appears to be the easiest job around these days;-) JOHN (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Fair and Balanced, as always.
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote: (snip) (...) A "possibly incorrect aspect of a news story"? You missed your calling, Dave!-- you shoulda been a whirling physician:-) JOHN (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

14 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR