Subject:
|
Re: Fair and Balanced, as always.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 16 Sep 2004 03:59:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1073 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
(snip)
| |
campaign calling for the retraction of a news story and the release
of source-names because of a possibly incorrect aspect of a news story
about Bush?
|
A “possibly incorrect aspect of a news story”? You missed your calling,
Dave!-- you shoulda been a whirling physician:-)
|
Well, I beg your pardon, but has the document been proven to be a forgery?
|
How can it? CBS refuses to release it for scrutiny! And besides, they only
have photocopies...
| |
And, if so, has CBS been shown to have had foreknowledge that it was forged?
|
Did they even check the veracity of the memos? Their supposed “expert” is even
distancing himself from them! It’s hack journalism at best.
| |
No? Then it’s not at all inaccurate to refer to it as a “possibly incorrect
aspect of a news story,” since the story dealt with a lot of evidence beyond
the memo.
What do you think should be done about scumbag Novak, by the way?
|
I’m not too up on that case, but
his
explanation seems reasonable.
JOHN
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Fair and Balanced, as always.
|
| (...) Well, I beg your pardon, but has the document been proven to be a forgery? And, if so, has CBS been shown to have had foreknowledge that it was forged? No? Then it's not at all inaccurate to refer to it as a "possibly incorrect aspect of a (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
