Subject:
|
Re: Fair and Balanced, as always.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 21:39:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
970 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
(snip)
| |
campaign calling for the retraction of a news story and the release
of source-names because of a possibly incorrect aspect of a news story about
Bush?
|
A “possibly incorrect aspect of a news story”? You missed your calling, Dave!--
you shoulda been a whirling physician:-)
JOHN
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Fair and Balanced, as always.
|
| (...) Well, I beg your pardon, but has the document been proven to be a forgery? And, if so, has CBS been shown to have had foreknowledge that it was forged? No? Then it's not at all inaccurate to refer to it as a "possibly incorrect aspect of a (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | Re: Fair and Balanced, as always.
|
| (...) You edited out everything but what was convenient to your attack and you think you won't be called on it? You missed your calling, John, you should be heading the election to re-elect Bush. :-) -->Bruce<-- (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Fair and Balanced, as always.
|
| (URL) let me see if I have this straight. Robert Novak, a stain on the fabric of humanity, faces no pressure for his deliberate and knowing leak of a CIA operative's name (a Federal crime) in an apparent effort to intimidate a critic of Bush, and (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
