 | | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Right on Schedule???
|
|
(...) What do you think? (...) Are you ignoring my clever wordplay? (...) Are you now the green-eyed grammar police? (...) :-) By coincidence, my son and I watched the original Batman movie last night-- they don't mak'em like they used to, do they? (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Right on Schedule
|
|
(...) Well, I suppose they did, though I wasn't really paying attention. I apologize if I let him off the hook too easy (and I think it is an established fact that John and I do not see eye to eye on politics or religion at all). But I do think he (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Right on Schedule???
|
|
(...) Does that impact my rhetorical question one way or another? (...) What would make you think otherwise? (...) Is that a rhetorical question that I just questioned? (...) Ascii depiction of Frank Gorshin in his Batman nemesis role? ??>Bruce<?? (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Right on Schedule
|
|
(...) lol Like I said, you choose to make noise rather than be honest. I hate nobody. I have a dislike for Sharon, his policies and extremist Israeli nationalism in general; but I know I’m not alone in that. I also have a dislike for Palestinian (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Further news management?
|
|
(...) Oh, but didn't you hear? We're "TURNING THE CORNER!" That's right! Or was that "going 'round the bend..."? Oh well, nothing a few more Wal-Mart greeter jobs can't make up! LFB (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Right on Schedule
|
|
(...) Are you not the KING of the noisemakers? Is (URL) this> not the latest proof? What is it with you and your anti-Israel axe grinding? Don't you think everyone knows by now that you hate Israel? Isn't that ground plowed enough? What ever is your (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Further news management?
|
|
(URL) Further news management?> If true, one has to wonder what this is costing the economy of the USA. Scott A (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution [may offend]
|
|
(...) I have a friend who, when we were kids, tended to use the F-word far too often. He was careful never to do this in front of his parents. On the one occasion he did, his father ordered him to "Stop f*$%£@&g swearing". I suppose, this is a case (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Right on Schedule
|
|
(...) "Good questions outrank easy answers". I have some of the answers. In this case, my feeling was that John was being rather disingenuous... I was just testing my hypothesis. John chose to make noise rather than be honest; your and Bruce's axe (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Maale Adoumin
|
|
(URL) Further theft.> Scott A (20 years ago, 2-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Right on Schedule
|
|
(...) John, Yet again you have snipped the best part of my post! (...) It takes two to tango John! Scott A (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Right on Schedule
|
|
(...) What's it to you? (...) Aren't you being a little paranoid? (...) Don't you know what you do when you assume? JOHN (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Right on Schedule
|
|
(...) Did I give you reason that I didn't? (...) Are you impuning Scott's communicative abilities? (...) Is that rhetorical question? ???? (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Right on Schedule
|
|
(...) Who wants to know? And why do you think they are interested? Am I wrong to assume you don't appreciate someone who has all the questions one could ever want? (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Right on Schedule
|
|
(...) Haven't you noticed that Scott debates via loaded questions? Do you think it is a communicable disease? Am I doomed to writing only questions now that I responded to this? :-0 --?Bruce?-- (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Right on Schedule
|
|
(...) Do you really expect me or anyone else to have the foggiest idea as to what you are talking about? But more importantly: will this ridiculous interchange continue in interrogatives? JOHN (20 years ago, 2-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Right on Schedule
|
|
(...) Is that really what you thought I meant? (...) Wow... Fox News! Even they qualified the headline with "appears"! It is strange how Scuds = Bush was right, whilst no Scuds = CIA was wrong... (...) (20 years ago, 2-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Right on Schedule
|
|
(...) So what is your point? Because I don't stick to facts means that you don't have to? (...) That was (URL) reported>. JOHN (20 years ago, 2-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
|
|
(...) I guess it depends on who you think gets to interpret the constitution and define our rights. The Supreme Court has at least sometimes supported the understanding that Larry and I share (I think), that the 9th is an umbrella for all rights (...) (20 years ago, 2-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
