 | | Re: How to get link pages made
|
|
Hey Tom, we have already tried. Why can't you do some digging before you rush out and say that. The .mecha group is at an impass, that's why I'm asking for help. What's your deal. Legomaster (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: How to get link pages made
|
|
(...) The average number of participants in .mecha have no relation to my not having time to make sure its links are up to date. (...) You can be sure it's nothing personal. I don't make any calls as to what 'deserves' to be added. (...) I probably (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: How to get link pages made
|
|
This is the key point here - you should be asking the Mecha Guys to curate the Mecha group. Why is that so hard to understand? (...) -- | Tom Stangl, Sun ONE Internet Technical Support, Sun Microsystems | iPlanet Support - (URL) Please do not (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: How to get link pages made
|
|
Dude, your still giving reasons not to help us. I said there are only a few people about. No one wants to take the job. As an example my Friend Dave said he would like to he just can't promise to keep up with it. Evan though I gave him a hard time (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: How to get link pages made
|
|
Your love for The Brick--indisputable Your appreciation for all things LEGO--unquestionable Your want for things on LUGNET to improve--admirable I did a quick scan--there are 52 top level groups in LUGNET (taken from the first page of Newsgroup, (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: How to get link pages made
|
|
Guys, were only talking about a Few People here. There are only a Dozen at best Mecha Builders who contribute to the .Mecha community who are unaccounted for. The links that are out of date have been out of date for a long time, and they were put (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Jenin
|
|
(...) killed number 23, Palestinians killed number 54, 22 of which were civilians. Israelis wounded number 75, Palestinians wounded number 220. 49 Palestinians are missing. FWIW, I didn't notice any great explanation in the delays insisted on by the (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | How to get link pages made
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes: <a bunch of good stuff... thanks. Great analogy to property tax by the way!> I just want to comment on this bit: (...) David: FTX is not that hard to learn to do the basics. It's way way was easier (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: Help Please Links! -----> .Mecha
|
|
(...) In the end, don't we all want to be happy? Can I *please* stomp on someone else's foot? That'll make me so happy! No? But I said please! There are soooo many newsgroups. If the admins were to take on the responsibility for maintaining links (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Jenin
|
|
(...) "Do you believe Israel committed human rights violations against Palestinians in Jenin?" 60% Yes 40% No 197531 Votes Perhaps that view was informed by Sharon. One of his demands of the now aborted UN fact-finding mission was that evidence (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Jenin
|
|
If anyone is actually trying to understand what happend, as opposed to some of the claims floating around, I found this article very interesting: (URL) Dan Boger dan@peeron.com (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Help Please Links! -----> .Mecha
|
|
Dude, I have my reasons, the beauty in life is the duality that exists in all truths. Please understand that I asked with a PLEASE. If someone asks please, perhaps compassion could take it somewhere. If you sat with me, you would know me for who I (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Help Please Links! -----> .Mecha
|
|
(...) How is this on topic for off-topic.debate? I gave you some pretty good advice on how to proceed (get a curator, by convincing someone to volunteer, or at least set up a links page yourself) as well as some constructive feedback, and your (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help Please Links! -----> .Mecha
|
|
Oh brother. (yawn.) (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Help Please Links! -----> .Mecha
|
|
Dave the net effect is the same. No one has come forward. Intentions or no, we still have no curator. I post around here quite a bit, there is no need to correct me. I remember just fine that you were interested in Curatorship a while back and I (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Statistics of Deadly Quarrels
|
|
(...) Pretty much like .off-topic.debate, really 8?) ROSCO (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: jumping to conclusions
|
|
(...) They have a rock to move and no lever. There are lands that they believe are by rights theirs that the state of Israel has occupied for a long time. They want an Israeli withdrawl. They've tried many things including appeal to the world (...) (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | The role of child-welfare or protection in the main political ideologies?
|
|
Howdy, regular readers know that a personal topic of interest for me is child welfare and what that means. I take fairly radical stances on the issue (some think in opposite directions), but that's not really what this is supposed to be about. I'm (...) (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Statistics of Deadly Quarrels
|
|
(...) You're funny Erik! I thought it was an interesting read even if it was weak on conclusion. Chris (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Statistics of Deadly Quarrels
|
|
(...) "A fascinating contribution to our ignorance of the topic." "A tour-de-force of admitting to be unable to draw a conclusion." "Remarkably illustrates the refreshing emptiness of sociology." (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
