 | | Re: GODMONEY (was re: Anthrax worse than AIDS?)
|
|
(...) I read from Richard's post a concern that a disease that has claimed millions of lives is still perceived as a "fringe" disease, while a disease that recently has claimed fewer than 10 lives has been the front page story in every news source (...) (23 years ago, 26-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: GODMONEY (was re: Anthrax worse than AIDS?)
|
|
(...) I'm not sure what you are getting at. Can you please elaborate? Who is this "nobody" that you are referring to? What connection are you assuming between Bible-purchases and AIDS deaths? If I purchase a Bible (which I have in the last year), am (...) (23 years ago, 26-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Anti-Semitism and Anti-Americanism
|
|
I'm sure that Wasserstein is aware that some of the "hatred" may well be entirely rational - does anyone seriously deny that? I know that for some time (prior to the events of Sept 11) Bush Jr almost appeared to be nurturing Amera-scepticism (...) (23 years ago, 26-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | "unconstitutional detention" (Re: So now it's official...)
|
|
(...) Indeed, I read about the case of Dr Mazen Al-Najjar who was held for over 3 years ( May 1997 - December 2000) without charge based on "secret evidence". He had lived in the USA since 1981. His lawyer said this when he was released (from BBC): (...) (23 years ago, 26-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: So now it's official...
|
|
(...) and (...) does (...) That's a big change IMO. And indefinitely "under some circumstances". But that was only an example - the bill contains many other changes as well. ROSCO (23 years ago, 26-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: So now it's official...
|
|
(...) This is only new in that it can be used to detain people who have otherwise legitimate papers. If you're found to be somehow suspect or in violation of your visa, you already *can* and often *are* detained without trial indefinitely, in (...) (23 years ago, 26-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | So now it's official...
|
|
(URL) I'm not an immigrant in the US: "For example, it denied the administration the power to detain indefinitely and without charges immigrants suspected of involvement in terrorism. The bill does expand the limit to seven days of detention, from (...) (23 years ago, 26-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Gotta love Oracle...
|
|
(...) Including things like this: (URL) (23 years ago, 26-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: GODMONEY (was re: Anthrax worse than AIDS?)
|
|
(...) Actually, I think you mean a Canadian. (Celine Dion) James P (23 years ago, 26-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | GODMONEY (was re: Anthrax worse than AIDS?)
|
|
Horst: Absolutely right. What matters over here is GOD and MONEY, or GODMONEY. Nobody cares if thousands of homosexuals suffer and die. Bible sales are up. At the top of the music charts are patriotic songs (sung by a French woman?). Our civil (...) (23 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | DCI tribute to September 11th.
|
|
Not sure if this is the right place to post this, but i didn't know where else it really fit. I was at DCI (Drums Corps International) 2001 Summer Music Games finals on August 11th. DCI has now posted a .mov file of the traditional finale - a medley (...) (23 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Anthrax worse than AIDS?
|
|
(...) Make that two: Brazil and South Africa. I have followed the brazilian case through Cable, so I understood some of the $$ involved. Nasty $-diplomacy... The brazilians have had some success since the introduction of State-manufactered drugs in (...) (23 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Anthrax worse than AIDS?
|
|
... or why foreign patents are less important than US patents To me it seems the US are trying to save some money in this case, whereas they did just about everything to protect their own profits with anti AIDS products. This even extends beyond (...) (23 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Can't Drive 65 (was 'Re: Tolerance of vice')
|
|
(...) Wouldn't that, at least gradually, also have to depend on whether the road or the residents were first to be there? :wq Horst (23 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Anti-Semitism and Anti-Americanism
|
|
I just came across this article, and thought that it would make good debate fodder. (It's sure to raise some hackles from some quarters.) It is by Bernard Wasserstein, Professor of History at the University of Glasgow, and President of the Jewish (...) (23 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Novels are now airline security risk...
|
|
(...) I think it is about time, with this reference, that the government says maybe we have gone a little too far. I mean, I can understand the book Hayduke Lives! as something that might turn an eye, but HARRY POTTER?!?! My god. What is the threat, (...) (23 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Gotta love Oracle...
|
|
(...) and typically Strine too (eg brekkie=breakfast, kindie=kindergarten). I'd never heard it before: as far as I knew "commo" and "commie" exclusively referred to communist. Ross mentioned the Holden vs Ford clan rivalry -- maybe that satisfies (...) (23 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Novels are now airline security risk...
|
|
Can somebody who understands this please explain the point about his driving licence? I assume it is used as ID? What does the date matter unless he intended to drive the plane to his planned destination? I mean this part: ==+== And the final reason (...) (23 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: A modest proposal
|
|
(...) Did you ever think that getting an answer from you was not the only aim? (...) It is my view that apart from the "what no answer" type posts you only answer the useless ones – i.e. the ones where you can score a cheap point. When I do make a (...) (23 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: rules
|
|
(...) I don't. People can (and do) get this wrong. If anyone wants to take an issue to debate, let them move it there. It’s no big deal. People should be able to reply to any message in any *appropriate* group. (...) For rules 2 & 3. I think there (...) (23 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
