 | | 'Virtual' Preservation Project for CKS
|
|
I'd like some comments on the following Idea.. Full Project Name : 'Virtual' Prservation of Construction Kit systems through the use of L-Cad type software Proposal : To contruct and mantain a series of 'part' libraries for L-Cad type software. Such (...) (21 years ago, 15-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | First Contact
|
|
New member, just checking to get the hang of posting. -Marius (21 years ago, 14-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Nano sized MB nano sets!
|
|
I found these today at the Claremont, NH Wal*Mart at a front register for 97 cents each (no tax in NH) They were in a smallish clear 'drop' display; the individual boxes are roughly 3/4 the size of a cigarette box. The side of each box shows that (...) (21 years ago, 12-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO® Blocked by Best-Lock
|
|
(...) I didn't know that--well, score one for LEGO, I guess. They've lost numerous similar cases, though, wherein it's been ruled that the patent expired long ago. Do you know when this case was decided? Dave! (21 years ago, 11-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO® Blocked by Best-Lock
|
|
(...) They're not... In the Netherlands, MegaBlocks started a similair trial, lost and since sales of Brick, MegaBlocks and the like are illegal in the Netherlands. And I for one am glad about it, since they're way too close to the real thing and (...) (21 years ago, 11-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO® Blocked by Best-Lock
|
|
(...) That's a good question. I have some Best-Lock instruction books (but no boxes) from '98 or '99, and I'll check them when I get home to see if the logo included a brick. I didn't realize that about the LEGO logo. Hmm... (...) Very true. There (...) (21 years ago, 11-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO® Blocked by Best-Lock
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) It's interesting that the Best-Lock logo uses their version of a 1 x 6 brick, not a 2 x 4 brick design. Did they change from a 2 x 4 logo during the course of this suit? Lego used to use the 2 x 4 as part of the "SYSTEM" logo, but (...) (21 years ago, 11-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO® Blocked by Best-Lock
|
|
(...) This is good news! I can’t think of a single reason why any company should be empowered to dictate which competitors are and are not allowed into the market, so this victory will benefit consumers and competitors alike. Besides which, anyone (...) (21 years ago, 11-Oct-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Network issues - looking for help
|
|
(...) Thanks to all of those that helped, after endless hours (actually DAYS) of work and frustration... The network is finally working!!! Thank you very much, to Chris, Ross, and Andy, between combining their most excellent advice, with my not so (...) (21 years ago, 8-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Network issues - looking for help
|
|
(...) Oops, my mistake, I mean the subnet mask is 255.255.255.0 (not the default gateway, as I had stated) This geek stuff is eating my brain. Janey "Red Brick" (21 years ago, 8-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Network issues - looking for help
|
|
(...) When we went to ipconfig... the info we got was the same... 192.168.2.10 mine 192.168.2.11 for him 192.168.2.1 for the router default gateway 255.255.255.0 we are both getting the router (192.168.2.1) for the default gateway Janey "Lost and (...) (21 years ago, 8-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Network issues - looking for help
|
|
(...) What's the IPs on these 3 nics? (yours, the router and the son's?) Sounds like his machine is getting an IP on a different subnet than yours from the router, and not getting his gateway ip set up right. (21 years ago, 8-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Bennett IS unworthy of being used as toilet paper
|
|
(...) It's a self-portrait, so he has no one to blame but himself. (...) We are getting somewhere at last. :-) (...) Followed by immediate regression. Since you admit that you are biased, how do the claims you are making have any validity? Not to (...) (21 years ago, 8-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Network issues - looking for help
|
|
Can anyone make heads or tails out of this network issue??? My computer (running XP HomeEd.) can access the Internet without issue. History... I have been using highspeed for a bit, and my children were starting to complain about dial up, as well as (...) (21 years ago, 8-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
|
|
(...) Heston should keep his mouth shut, then? (...) $40,000,000 to discover a non-crime seems a bit excessive. Other than such a criminal waste of money, I must admit I'm with you in saying I couldn't care less (the only time I care is when some (...) (21 years ago, 8-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
|
|
(...) Appropriate? Don't know if I use that word. Listen, most of the news churned out by the media is pure pulp. Think Hollywood. I couldn't care less about a star's private life; in fact, the less I know about it, the better for them, because I (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | CD instructions
|
|
Hello I'm JAC, My last modell, is another truck, yet. And, I like to have more informations of my MOC, to built another one easely. Before, I took a lot of photos, but, this time, I create a CD informations, and I propose to sell someone. You can (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Test
|
|
Hi, just to see, if my message go well (21 years ago, 7-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
|
|
(...) Hey, something just occurred to me. With your above statement in mind, would you say that it is appropriate or inappropriate to have a citizen's private extramarital affair dragged through the media for months on end? Just curious... As (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bennett IS unworthy of being used as toilet paper
|
|
(...) Because he is neither the idiot nor the racist he's painted to be. (...) Fair enough. (...) Well, yes, because I know of him and know his politics, and so I know that the charges against him are baseless. As far as "defending Bennett to get at (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
