Subject:
|
Re: Questionable eBay auction
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.theory
|
Date:
|
Sun, 30 Jan 2000 13:07:40 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@^nospam^novera.com
|
Viewed:
|
1620 times
|
| |
|
|
I think I read John's post too fast. If John is talking about a US money
order drawn on a US branch of a US bank, I agree with you, it's blatant
and there is no reason for it. The seller may be confused or shady.
However all the other examples you cite DO cost me money when I deposit
via my CU and DON'T when I go to a local bank where I have a savings
account just for that reason. But **I** surcharge for going to the bank
because I have to physically go there. My CU I can just mail deposits in
via postage paid mailers they supply.
--
Larry Pieniazek - larryp@novera.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
Note: this is a family forum!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Questionable eBay auction
|
| Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <3894379C.B58A17EE@v...er.net>... (...) Postage paid deposit mailers is one of the reasons I stuck with my small town bank so long. Unfortunately, they got sucked up by a bigger bank (though we didn't really notice (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Questionable eBay auction
|
| (...) Is this a common practise in the States? It seems like a blatant example of shafting the customer, to me. I can see a fee for MO's not in US funds, or for MO's not drawn against a US bank, but a US money order drawn on a US bank should be (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jan-00, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.theory)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
