To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.market.theoryOpen lugnet.market.theory in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Marketplace / Theory / 2576
2575  |  2577
Subject: 
Re: Did Bricklink make Lego bulk sales irrelevent?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.market.theory
Date: 
Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:29:38 GMT
Viewed: 
37 times
  
In lugnet.general, Leonard Hoffman wrote:

However, lets take Troy's Surplus for example - he sells the Dark Grey 1x2 brick
for .04 a piece!  TLG sells it at .06 a piece - at the max discount of 15%, it
is .052 per piece.

So, either Troy is buying in bulk, parting them out, and taking a severe cut.
OR TLG isn't selling at the lowest profitable price they can.  Or there are
hidden costs in supply to bulk, that Troy avoids by parting himself.

But the seller isn't buying the bulk bricks from TLG and then directly reselling
them.  Instead, the seller buys a $10 set that has five less common pieces.
Let's say he can sell those pieces for $2 each, then there are a bunch of other,
more common pieces in the set that he can sell for whatever he wants and it's
all profit.  The dark grey brick in the above example is a pretty common piece,
and shows up in lots and lots of sets.

Bruce



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Did Bricklink make Lego bulk sales irrelevent?
 
(...) What I find so interesting about this question is that all LEGO ultimately comes from the same source: TLG itself. Now, understanding that, there are certain Bricklink sellers who buy multiple sets for the sole purpose of parting them out and (...) (21 years ago, 10-Sep-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.theory)

28 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR