To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.market.theoryOpen lugnet.market.theory in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Marketplace / Theory / 2575
2574  |  2576
Subject: 
Re: Did Bricklink make Lego bulk sales irrelevent?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.market.theory
Date: 
Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:06:21 GMT
Viewed: 
21 times
  
In lugnet.general, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
Kevin Johnston wrote:
There are two other explanations; one, the cost per brick when parting is lower
regardless of any hidden costs,

i dont understand what you mean here.. cost of brick, as i understand it is Cost
to Manufacture, then part out into sets (which should be saved since its bulk),
then cost of shipping.  "Hidden" means there something else in this mix im not
aware of (customs might fall into this batch)

Sorry, I slightly misread the original (see last sentence I was replying to),
but still a slightly different point: what I mean is that a BL's seller's
cost-per-brick may well be competitive or better than S@H's *regardless* of
non-obvious costs.  Many BL sellers pick things up on clearance; many others
charge a lot for scarce pieces, leaving them room to lower their cost basis on
common parts.


or two, which is what I believe, it's not really
possible for a BL seller to charge more than Lego Bulk prices, regardless of
their cost basis.  Seriously, who would buy, if they did that?

Most of BL charges more than Lego for many items, altho mostly rare figs,
pieces, etc.

Right -- mostly rare.

...  But the real reason to buy BL? I want six 1x4.. not 50.. even if I
pay 20 cents each, i save because i only want six.

But if you're right, and the BL seller automatically lowers his price to compete
with TLG.. wouldn't s/he be then run out of business?  Troy can't continually
take a loss in order to move product just to be competetive - eventually he'll
go bankrupt!  No, BL sellers (bulk sellers, not used lego sellers) must be
making a profit, simply for the logic of it!

I doubt that very much, tho it would be interesting to find out.  I would expect
many of them are simply getting rid of parts they don't want.  (I could
certainly be wrong about that.)

Kevin



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Did Bricklink make Lego bulk sales irrelevent?
 
(...) i dont understand what you mean here.. cost of brick, as i understand it is Cost to Manufacture, then part out into sets (which should be saved since its bulk), then cost of shipping. "Hidden" means there something else in this mix im not (...) (21 years ago, 10-Sep-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.theory)

28 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR