To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.market.theoryOpen lugnet.market.theory in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Marketplace / Theory / 2564
2563  |  2565
Subject: 
Re: Did Bricklink make Lego bulk sales irrelevent?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.market.theory
Date: 
Wed, 10 Sep 2003 15:22:00 GMT
Viewed: 
20 times
  
In lugnet.general, Bryan Kinkel wrote:

D. Why do you purchase Lego elements through Shop@Home versus BrickLink? Or
BrickLink over Shop@Home?

If something is available both at S@H and BL, I will typically get it via S@H.
Mostly a matter of convenience.  S@H takes my Visa.  It's a secure site, and
keeps my shopping cart from session to session.  The 'is this seller honest/will
the PO lose the package/how will the bricks be packed' worry doesn't exist.
One-stop shopping with no e-mail back and forth; I submit my order, and 5-7 days
later it's on my doorstep.

I buy at Bricklink when I see a sizeable quantity of something on my want list,
or when I have a project that needs parts S@H doesn't have and I can't easily
part out sets from retail for the quanity I want.

James



Message is in Reply To:
  Did Bricklink make Lego bulk sales irrelevent?
 
It has been a while since the bulk selection offered by Lego Shop@Home as been expanded beyond a new release or two. (Where are the gray tiles!?) And this got me thinking - A. Did the arrival of BrickLink create a viable alternative to bulk sales (...) (21 years ago, 10-Sep-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.theory)  

28 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR