| |
> It would be very cool to track the price of individual sets overtime.
> Even if the number were not 100% accurate, it would still give new
> buyers (and new sellers) an estimate to a given set's worth (on ebay).
we've started to do that already, however, we only have about 2 months of data
(not great for lego, i think 6mo would be best) and we're only counting US,
FPO/APO and Canadian auctions (sorry, the rest mess up the prices) and complete
sets (well, piece complete, not boxes or instructions, as those can be aquired)
it's facinating to find some things like:
4558: average price: $422.25 lowest: $377.50 highest: $467.00
6399: average price: $361.27 lowest: $325.00 highest: $386.99
it's pretty cool, but not quite ready for human comsumption yet (soon,
hopefully) now all we need is a name :)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: ebay and auczilla stats
|
| Well- the Dow Jones was named after Charles Dow and Edward Jones. I think you should name your tracking indices after yourself... or some famous celebrity in the world of Lego. The Boger and Boger Set Index, the Boger and Boger Brick Index or Piece (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: ebay and auczilla stats
|
| I'm interested in this information. LEGO-VOL has the dollar sum of auctions that ended in the past seven days: $61431 x 52 weeks = nearly $3.2M / year. Wow. To me, that's a lot of money. But to TLC, I assume it is not- TLC had $1.3B 1999 total (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.theory)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
