| |
On Sun, 19 May 2002, John Henry Kruer wrote:
> I think its just a cheap clone with a box that's a redone lego picture.
> The seller guy apparently either dosn't know about the clone property or
> trying to fool us. (Its so annoying when you do a search on Lego something
> on ebay and you find LEGO-compatable Mega Block or simply Lego Megablock.
> It seems that these people are just ignorent of clone brands)
They are also in blatant violation of Ebay's policies against key word
spamming and requiring listing items in the proper category. Has anyone
successfully complained to Ebay about this? After all, those policies are
in their interest, quite aside from the propect of TLC's legal department
breathing down their necks. . .
Please FUT .market.services
--
TWS Garrison
http://www.math.purdue.edu/~tgarriso/
Remove capital letters in address for direct reply.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: "Lego" from China Sets?????
|
| (...) But it's not "key word spamming," since the product is, after all, "LEGO-compatible," and that's one of its intended selling points. Why would it be any different to describe a LEGO lot as "Red Bricks," since both "red" and "brick" could be (...) (23 years ago, 20-May-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.services)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: "Lego" from China Sets?????
|
| (...) Hmmm... A don't think its a (direct) photo edit on the part of the E-Bay person. I dunno about the company... the cowboy looks too fudged when zoomed in... but not the cannon. The whole turntable complex, however, along with the baseplate, (...) (23 years ago, 19-May-02, to lugnet.general)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
