Subject:
|
Re: Cancelling orders -- a Brickbay issue
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade
|
Date:
|
Sun, 10 Sep 2000 18:59:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
484 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, Dan Jezek writes:
> In lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, Geoffrey Hyde writes:
> > What made the second order from Spitz invalid? According to your very own
> > TOS, the seller is still obligated to complete the transaction if it is
> > valid.
>
> I think the only issue Brickbay has in this mess is whether or not to close
> Clark's shop. It would be too harsch of a punishment to shut down a seller
> upon a first screw up. It's true that Clark violated the TOS but that doesn't
> mean that his shop should be shut down since Clark is a responsible seller and
> this is the first complaint about him.
Mostly, I agree with this. It is too harsh of a punishment, and I was mad when
I made the request. It was partly to express this anger that I made the
request at all. I honestly did not expect the Clark shop to be shut down.
However, I do think it is the resonsibility of Brickbay to have informed Clark
that he did violate the terms of service. The response from Clark that I
recieved indicated that he felt 'in the right' by his actions. (I do not know
if this has happened, as I wouldn't necessarily be a party to that particular
conversation.)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Cancelling orders -- a Brickbay issue
|
| (...) I think the only issue Brickbay has in this mess is whether or not to close Clark's shop. It would be too harsch of a punishment to shut down a seller upon a first screw up. It's true that Clark violated the TOS but that doesn't mean that his (...) (24 years ago, 9-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
