Subject:
|
Re: Cancelling orders -- a Brickbay issue
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade
|
Date:
|
Fri, 2 Mar 2001 20:28:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
560 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, Dan Jezek writes:
> I'm leaning towards a rule that sellers should have the right to refuse
> service to anyone and cancelling a transaction is one way of completing it.
> If noone objects then I'll incorporate it into the TOS.
A situation has come up in which I think the ability to "refuse service to
anyone" would be a good thing to have. Brickbay has a discussion forum now,
and there is some discussion on it there. (thanks to Julie K. for reminding
me of it!)
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Cancelling orders -- a Brickbay issue
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G9L7Jx.D31@lugnet.com... (...) it. (...) now, (...) reminding (...) Is it possible to get the Brickbay discussion forum via NNTP? I should probably be asking there instead of here (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Cancelling orders -- a Brickbay issue
|
| (...) I think the only issue Brickbay has in this mess is whether or not to close Clark's shop. It would be too harsch of a punishment to shut down a seller upon a first screw up. It's true that Clark violated the TOS but that doesn't mean that his (...) (24 years ago, 9-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
