Subject:
|
Re: double entendres (was Re: I've been out of action, and need to contact Melody Brown ASAP!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:29:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
460 times
|
| |
|
|
Why is it these things all take three weeks before I know about them?
(Computer lost all data on hard disk, etc. - I know - have fun picking apart
*that* lot!!)
I put in a perfectly decent subject line, and someone I don't know except by
his reputation calls it a double entendre. I think you're interpreting it
out of context - while I'm on the Internet I'm "in action", as I stated in
the quoted subject line above.
It has nothing whatsoever to do with Mrs. Brown, I'm quite certain she's got
enough things to worry about without other people's good-natured attempts at
humor coming up with stuff like this, and I'm equally certain she'd like the
subject to be dropped entirely.
I'm emailing a copy of this to Todd, I'm certain he would see my point of
view. It's not quite the reaction I expected from a mature bunch of AFOLs.
--
Cheers ...
Geoffrey Hyde
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
news:G7xHC4.8xG@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.loc.au, Richard Parsons writes:
> > In lugnet.loc.au, Geoffrey Hyde writes:
>
> > Hoo-eee Geoffrey, that's quite a note to drop in a newsgroup...
>
> You got that right!
>
> I'm glad that I'm not the only old geezer who spotted the double entendre • in
> the subject line. (and yes, I've met Melody and had that been what • Geoffrey
> actually meant, I would totally sympathise with the sentiment as... er...
> well, I can't describe exactly what I would say and still remain within • the
> bounds of chivalry and family ratings. But it wasn't what he meant, I'm • sure.)
>
> ++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
