Subject:
|
Re: Could we get .org.au up soon
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Jun 2000 10:24:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
688 times
|
| |
|
|
"James Howse" wrote a good summary of the ins and outs of the proverbial
aquatic fowl's digestive system.
I didn't sense any support for .org.au.studs at the recent get together
either, nor for .org.au.legoz.
.org.au would seem to make sense in terms of meeting the needs other folks
have expressed hereabouts, but for me personally, the existing .loc.au does
it all.
Todd has a need for a Studly official to speak and I can understand that,
and Santosh would seem to me to be the man.
I know Mark has his issues and is lobbying hard outside Lugnet, but to me
this is all fairly straightforward. Todd's site, Todd's rules. Seems to me
that within the limits set and agreed we can pretty much achieve all we
want. Stay far enough outside the rules for long enough and you're out of
the game. And you're still free to start your own (other) game if you want.
I just don't have a problem with that. But then, I'm not here for the
trading - it happens, but sort of by accident and on the side and in email.
I like it fine that way.
Running Lugnet must be a <<expletive indicating extreme badness deleted>> of
a job, and it seems to me Todd shows a patience and a community focus that
goes way beyond the necessary.
Richard
Still baldly going...
934 and closing....
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | To Todd - Could we get .org.au up soon
|
| Todd, Consider this to be as official or unofficial as you like, as chances are I'll just cut'n'paste an email to you from this if thats whats required. Recently the traffic on Lugnet under the loc.au groups have indicated that there's a significant (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Could we get .org.au up soon
|
| (...) Is this Santosh's ball (STUDLY Wordsmith To The Powers That Be) or do we need a new hat? Whilst It's nice to have Ben raise the issue again some consensus (as much as possible given the tyranny of distance) should be reached. For this reason (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
