Subject:
|
Re: .org.au.*
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Fri, 2 Jun 2000 04:43:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1073 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, Peter Callaway writes:
> Possibly we should also keep the following groups as there is activity in
> them, and/or they further breaks down the states and territories (since some
> of them are lare areas);
> lugnet.loc.au.act.can lugnet.loc.au.sw.syd lugnet.loc.au.nt.dar
> lugnet.loc.au.qld.bri lugnet.loc.au.sa.ade lugnet.loc.au.vic.mel
> lugnet.loc.au.wa.per
I think Loc.au.tas.hob should be added to this list, just to maintain the
capital cities theme.
> We should close off the following groups and divert the current messages to
> the next available group in the tree;
> lugnet.loc.au.nsw.new lugnet.loc.au.nt.als lugnet.loc.au.qld.bun
> lugnet.loc.au.qld.cai lugnet.loc.au.qld.goc lugnet.loc.au.qld.mac
> lugnet.loc.au.qld.mis lugnet.loc.au.qld.roc lugnet.loc.au.qld.too
> lugnet.loc.au.qld.tow lugnet.loc.au.tas.hob lugnet.loc.au.wa.alb
> lugnet.loc.au.wa.bun lugnet.loc.au.wa.ger lugnet.loc.au.wa.hed
> lugnet.loc.au.wa.kal
>
> If anyone feels left out by this then additional groups could be
> created/reinstated, however maintenance of subgroups from the state/territory
> groups should be on a volume of traffic basis. If a group just sits there not
> being used at all (as many of the above groups have) then it is obviously not
> required.
Yes this is pertinent to all of Lugnet.
> We should create the following new groups and allow posting of all auction and
> market information in them, along with organisationally relevant information;
> lugnet.org.au - which covers LegOz (all of Australia, eventually we hope)
> lugnet.org.au.studs - which covers the NSW group Studs
*nod* and further additions to lugnet.org.au.* as more groups are formed.
> I don't think we need lugnet.org.au.nsw.studs as that is getting too
> compartmentalised (which can be a bad thing from time to time).
The NSW in this would be redundant, therefore not necessary.
> Although it has been dealt with in no uncertain terms (and I'll probably get a
> smack on the bottom for mentioning it again) I still think the most obvious
> place for market/sales/auction information pertinent to Australia is in
> loc.au. Call me stuborn, fundamentally inflexible, whatever, but that's just
> the way I see it. But since Peter Callaway <> Lugnet sysadmin I guess that's
> that. Just don't be surprised if I inadvertently get myself pulled over by the
> Lugnet police to be issued a T&C infringement notice if in my enthusiasm to
> post something I forget where it is meant to go.
>
> Anyway, </rant> and all that, let's canvas the loc.au population and see if we
> can agree to/refine my suggestions above and put this whole messy thing behind
> us.
I think this is the crux of the argument, we can't canvas loc.au as the rules
as loc.au is bound by Lugnet rules. In other words if you want to be part of
loc.au then you abide by lugnet rules.
However Todd has given a certain amount of freedom by forming the loc.au.org
subgroup, where the users can determine the content to a certain degree.
Now what i see as happening is that, all traffic from loc.au will move to
loc.au.org, (well the users using it at the moment anyhow, we just have to
form up as a group and make everyone an "official" member of LegOz).
The only people that may use loc.au, are those who aren't in LegOz (ie.
newbie) or those who aren't in Australia.
My opinion?: so be it. We all start posting to loc.org.au instead of loc.au,
maybe we can be the most active national club in the world (the first National
all encompassing club too right?)
Santosh.
(Yes too long a week, luckily its almost over)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: .org.au.*
|
| (...) Hear Hear Santosh! Sounds like a great idea, keep an eye on loc.au for newbies, and post to loc.au.org. Yeehaa! our own Legoz group where we can sell to and buy from fellow Aussies to our hearts content. Perhaps if we want anything not avail (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: .org.au.*
|
| (...) OK, time for a different approach. Feel free to flame/praise me as you see fit. At the very least we need to keep the following groups; lugnet.loc.au.act lugnet.loc.au.nsw lugnet.loc.au.nt lugnet.loc.au.qld lugnet.loc.au.sa lugnet.loc.au.tas (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
