Subject:
|
Re: .org.au.*
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Fri, 2 Jun 2000 01:38:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
953 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.loc.au, Todd Lehman writes:
> > [...]
> > On the other hand, if you guys/gals do now have an official "club" or user
> > group for Australias, then let's go ahead and set up a lugnet.org.au (or
> > lugnet.org.au.legoz or whatever you decide) and then you can set rules and
> > guidelines for _that_ newsgroup because it would be a community- • created/grown
> > newsgroup set up to serve a specific target of people (i.e., your club).
> >
> > Inside of your specific club newsgroup (also automatically a mailing list),
> > you can specially tailor whatever rules you want, so long as they don't
> > (obviously) do anything illegal or get LUGNET in trouble.
>
> Well, according to EricK's latest map of the Australia/Oceana area,
>
> http://www.lugnet.com/map/ao/lug/
>
> There are actually two groups now for Australias -- LegOz and Studs.
>
> If you wanted newsgroups/mailing-lists for these in the lugnet.org.* hierarchy
> of groups, here's how they'd look to fit in:
>
> lugnet.org.au.legoz <===> lugnet.org.au.legoz@lugnet.com
> lugnet.org.au.studs <===> lugnet.org.au.studs@lugnet.com
>
> Is this something you would like? If so, please have an official from either
> or both of LegOz and Studs contact me and I'll set up the groups/lists.
>
> Additionally (or perhaps instead of) would you prefer a single group
>
> lugnet.org.au <===> lugnet.org.au@lugnet.com
>
> to cover both LegOz and Studs?
>
> Lemme know if you want 0, 1, 2, or all 3 groups...
>
> And also lemme know if you'll allow auction announcements/updates in the
> LegOz/Studs-specific groups.
Hi Todd,
LegOz and STUDS are one and the same at the moment.
We're having more problems than the TORAL's when it comes to what we're called
We're hoping other people in other capitals will get togethera and form groups
hopefully under the LegOz (or whatever it will be called banner).
I won't appoint myself as spokesthing for the group, just express a personal
opinion and let others add and subtract from it.
We have trouble here with a thin spread of message over too may groups.
People will post and then give up, due to little response in their local
group. Mark.H did not even realise there was a loc.au group (it all depends
how you access Lugnet, if only certain groups are emailed, people may as well
live in Oblivia (;)) As pete.c said maybe we need only one group per state,
loc.au and one .org group.
anyway that's my US$0.014 worth,
pete.w
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: .org.au.*
|
| (...) OK, time for a different approach. Feel free to flame/praise me as you see fit. At the very least we need to keep the following groups; lugnet.loc.au.act lugnet.loc.au.nsw lugnet.loc.au.nt lugnet.loc.au.qld lugnet.loc.au.sa lugnet.loc.au.tas (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | .org.au.*
|
| (...) Well, according to EricK's latest map of the Australia/Oceana area, (URL) are actually two groups now for Australias -- LegOz and Studs. If you wanted newsgroups/mailing-lists for these in the lugnet.org.* hierarchy of groups, here's how (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
