Subject:
|
Re: .org.au.*
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Fri, 2 Jun 2000 13:43:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1039 times
|
| |
|
|
"Peter Callaway" <pcallaway@bmcl.com.au> wrote
>
> At the very least we need to keep the following groups;
> lugnet.loc.au.act lugnet.loc.au.nsw lugnet.loc.au.nt lugnet.loc.au.qld
> lugnet.loc.au.sa lugnet.loc.au.tas lugnet.loc.au.vic lugnet.loc.au.wa
<<Nods>> One for each state and territory in the commonwealth ... I'm with
you. Good plan.
> Possibly we should also keep the following groups as there is activity in
> them, and/or they further breaks down the states and territories (since • some
> of them are large areas);
> lugnet.loc.au.act.can lugnet.loc.au.nsw.syd lugnet.loc.au.nt.dar
> lugnet.loc.au.qld.bri lugnet.loc.au.sa.ade lugnet.loc.au.vic.mel
> lugnet.loc.au.wa.per
<<raises an eyebrow>> I'm cool with this, but I'm not sure it contributes.
Its hard to imagine what goes in .nsw.syd that doesn't work in .nsw, and
even harder to imagine something that would go in .nsw that would not be
quite at home in .nsw.syd
> We should close off the following groups and divert the current messages • to
> the next available group in the tree;
> lugnet.loc.au.nsw.new lugnet.loc.au.nt.als lugnet.loc.au.qld.bun
> lugnet.loc.au.qld.cai lugnet.loc.au.qld.goc lugnet.loc.au.qld.mac
> lugnet.loc.au.qld.mis lugnet.loc.au.qld.roc lugnet.loc.au.qld.too
> lugnet.loc.au.qld.tow lugnet.loc.au.tas.hob lugnet.loc.au.wa.alb
> lugnet.loc.au.wa.bun lugnet.loc.au.wa.ger lugnet.loc.au.wa.hed
> lugnet.loc.au.wa.kal
<<Nods furiously>>
> We should create the following new groups and allow posting of all auction • and
> market information in them, along with organisationally relevant • information;
> lugnet.org.au - which covers LegOz (all of Australia, eventually we hope)
> lugnet.org.au.studs - which covers the NSW group Studs
<<Nods some more>>
> Although it has been dealt with in no uncertain terms (and I'll probably • get a
> smack on the bottom for mentioning it again) I still think the most • obvious
> place for market/sales/auction information pertinent to Australia is in
> loc.au. Call me stuborn, fundamentally inflexible, whatever, but that's • just
> the way I see it. But since Peter Callaway <> Lugnet sysadmin I guess • that's
> that. Just don't be surprised if I inadvertently get myself pulled over by • the
> Lugnet police to be issued a T&C infringement notice if in my enthusiasm • to
> post something I forget where it is meant to go.
<<Stops nodding because neck is getting sore>> I'm pretty much with Todd on
this part. I can understand the logic in keeping the market stuff out of
the way, much as it doesn't really inspire me either way. We post about
what we seek in general posts - regulars are going to be aware of what folks
are after, and I think the trading will more or less happen anyway, but
perhaps more by email. In the meantime, the prohibition keeps the general,
shotgun blast market stuff out of one's way.
Or not obviously.
Richard
Still baldly going...
Check out Port Block at http://www.hinet.net.au/~rparsons/port/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: .org.au.*
|
| (...) Merely a suggestion. I'd be quite happy to see these groups shut down and everything moved up to the state/territory subgroups under loc.au. I just don't think we have the volume of traffic nor the demographic spread to justify anything more. (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: .org.au.*
|
| (...) OK, time for a different approach. Feel free to flame/praise me as you see fit. At the very least we need to keep the following groups; lugnet.loc.au.act lugnet.loc.au.nsw lugnet.loc.au.nt lugnet.loc.au.qld lugnet.loc.au.sa lugnet.loc.au.tas (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
