 | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —John Neal
|
| | | (...) That's all well and good if indeed 1) There really *is* a Todd Lehman and b) if there is (which I highly doubt) *you* are *he*;-) -John (25 years ago, 21-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —Stephen Jacquot
|
| | | | (...) They say that Todd works in mysterious ways. (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —Jeremy Sproat
|
| | | | (...) Assuming there is a Todd. The LUGNET Creationist Theory was all well and fine up until the last twelve months or so, but come on! The evidence is overwhelming that selective adaptation gave us LUGNET, not some creation invoked by some sentient (...) (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | (...) b) (...) In the last couple of months I have actually met someone who claims to be a Todd but I have to real proof he is a Todd never mind the Todd. I also meet a Suzanne that corroborated his story of being Todd, but then again I was unable (...) (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —Gary R. Istok
|
| | | | (...) Actually Larry P. showed me a picture of Todd, so there is some proof of his existence. (Or perhaps Lar is in on the hoax, and he got that picture with his new wallet?) Gary Istok (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) lol! (...) All hail Larry!!?? Or perhaps Lar is a hoax, too??!! My world, I see it crashing down all around me!! First Tom McSpamcake gets abducted, then I find out Todd and Elvis are chimerical chums, and now the Great One Larry is a fraud. (...) (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | Look. For people that consider what I say sufficient proof, Todd exists. I say so. I claim to have met him AND Suz multiple times. Sometimes he even gave me things to share with the rest of you, like the seeds of the various Jambalaya boxes (which (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | The existence of Todd (was Re: **Bad Trader??** —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | (...) Oh, you say so. It's a little harder to convince people he exists then that. (...) Did you ever *hear* him say anything on a hill;-) Did/Are you writing it down? (...) But what if you *hadn't* personally met him? Would/*could* you believe in (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: The existence of Todd (was Re: **Bad Trader??** —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | | | | | (...) There was something BEFORE LUGNET? :) Scott S. (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: The existence of Todd (was Re: **Bad Trader??** —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | | | (...) There are legends of a world once wrought with chaotic messages, spam, flame, and the occasional unrequested post from porn and infomercail cites... This world was called RTL. Then the almighty Todd did come, and he did say: "Let there be (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: The existence of Todd (was Re: **Bad Trader??** —Jeremy Sproat
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) I knew a guy who said he had been there. He explored the murky depths of RTL, and escaped tell horrid tales of off-topic messages, threads of flame, and the shapeless "me too" creatures basking in the insipid cold glow of the Beforeworld. (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: The existence of Todd (was Re: **Bad Trader??** —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) flame, (...) however, (...) the (...) I don't believe in the before-Lugnet. I think this whole "RTL" thing is an urban legend. I mean, everyone has a story like this one. 'I knew someone who knows this guy who reads RTL...' but when you try to (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: The existence of Todd (was Re: **Bad Trader??** —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | | | | (...) Piffle. I was just there today. If you made a map of the area it would be marked "Here there be larval flamers". We may WISH RTL went away but it's still there, like a bad penny, it keeps coming back. Now, is it a sin to go slumming to RTL? (25 years ago, 24-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: The existence of Todd (was Re: **Bad Trader??** —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Yes, my son, you have sinned indeed. But the Lord Todd is forgiving. You must plead with him for His forgiveness. Your pennance shall be four "Hail Todd"s. DaveE (25 years ago, 24-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: The existence of Todd (was Re: **Bad Trader??** —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) "Hail Todd, full of plates, blessed is the fruit of thy labor LUGNET" ? ;John (...) (25 years ago, 24-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: The existence of Todd (was Re: **Bad Trader??** —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | | | | | David Eaton wrote in message ... (...) flame, (...) however, (...) the (...) This is not the very beginning. Valid scientific theories say that, at the very beginning, there was a chaotic hot cloud consist of spam and flame. Selçuk (25 years ago, 24-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —Josh Spaulding
|
| | | | | | | (...) There is only one Todd, and Larry is his prophet? Josh Spaulding (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —Jeremy Sproat
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) LOL -- "By the mad prophet Larry!" Name *THAT* reference, I dare you! :-, Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) "profit";-) (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Ya mean all that Todd is getting out of this is Larry? Wow. Todd is *really* dedicated to the hobby. <grin, duck and cover!) James (URL) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Don't be fooled. It's a lot! <wait for me!> -John (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —Naji Norder
|
| | | | | | | (...) Hmmm... Letters mailed to Santa Claus get read (though I've never sent Santa a check), and packages often come from Santa bearing goodies... Is there a Santa - Todd connection? ;-) Naji (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —Ben Gatrelle
|
| | | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Larry Pieniazek writes: <clip> (...) Maybe Todd is like Susan Williams!?! Ben (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —Jeremy Sproat
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) No no no no... Susan Williams is the evil Anti-Todd. The difference is blindingly obvious: Susan Williams uses a signature stamp, while Todd doesn't. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Modern Science (was Re: **Bad Trader??** —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | | | | I beleive Sproatatronic inadvertantly left the tail end of his last sentence off. Come with me now to LarryLabs(tm) where our crack scientific team will attempt to reconstruct the omitted ending. (...) <whirrr, click, click, THUD, "ouch", big red (...) (25 years ago, 24-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —Johannes Keukelaar
|
| | | | | | | | | | "JS" == Sproaticus <jsproat@io.com> writes: JS> No no no no... Susan Williams is the evil Anti-Todd. The JS> difference is blindingly obvious: Susan Williams uses a signature JS> stamp, while Todd doesn't. <serious>I've heard that name bandied about (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —Jeremy Sproat
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) *ding* *ding* *ding* *ding* *ding* *ding* *ding* *ding* *ding* *ding* *ding* ANNOUNCER: I'm sorry, but the proper question is, "who is Suzanne *Rich*?" Don Pardo, why don't you tell Johannes what he could've won? DON: You might have won...a (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) ??!! (...) I thought it was a snack cake. Not to be confused with Lazy Susan, who can spin quite a tale. "Q", however, is like a God, but not *the* God, who is not to be confused with Todd. He's just a layman. (...) I think you *are* mixing (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Todd-weh? Is that acro ever mentioned in the bible? (...) Oops. Jasper (25 years ago, 26-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) I don't know, but I'm sure I've heard those syllables on "Teletubbies" or out of a "Furby." Eh-oh! Todd-weh! Eeny-oony-wanah! (A chewed 2x8 blue beam with white-out on one side to the person who can identify that last line!) (...) I'm a (...) (25 years ago, 26-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Wow. Just did the big 360. I'm having deja vu all over again;-) -John (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | | | Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <37EA00C2.12B7E5FA@v...er.net>... (...) It's just like god exist since his/her prophet (Jesus, Muhammed, etc) show that it is written in his/her book (bible, kuran, etc.) that each of them meet him/her several (...) (25 years ago, 24-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) I looked in my navel. Didn't find any blue mud, but the fuzz is sufficient evidence for me. Do you want to look in my navel too? (...) This is off-topic.FUN. If you want to start a debate you're in the wrong room. :-) (25 years ago, 24-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | | | | Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <37EB4ABF.374238EC@v...er.net>... (...) show (...) Muwhahah....No, no ..Thanks for the nice offer..maybe another time..:-) (...) Thanks...:-) Selçuk "wondering how he can show it if I would want" Göre PS. Larry, did (...) (25 years ago, 24-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | (...) OBPython: Not necessarily. He could be debating in his free time. ;) James (URL) (25 years ago, 24-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) LOL Now *they* were/are good humor! -John (...) (25 years ago, 24-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | (...) This thread isn't dead... It's just sleeping. I imagine there are a lot of MP resources out there in webland, does anyone have a URL for a personal fave? A site that let one look up quotes and references would be good. ++Lar (at some random (...) (25 years ago, 24-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —Steve Campbell
|
| | | | | | (...) "It, it's full of stars!" SteveC Perilous Pirate Page (URL) moved the Lighthouse! To find out how: (URL) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | | Gary Istok wrote in message <37E909C4.1882DE94@u...ch.edu>... (...) that is (...) Lehman and (...) and (...) is (...) a (...) meet a (...) unable (...) faked (...) (heh-heh). (...) his (...) his new (...) Friends, Could you please stop this? Don't (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: **Bad Trader??** —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I missed this particular point the first time around. I need to point out that while Todd and Suz make a fine couple they are not really wallet picture material... ++Lar (25 years ago, 24-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
