Subject:
|
Re: Why 5 to 6?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Aug 1999 18:04:00 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@SAYNOTOSPAMnovera.com
|
Viewed:
|
1178 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote:
>
> > I'm usually pretty smart, but this issue still has me guessing.
>
> You've got me. Maybe the great prophet Larry will expand on his previous
> statement.
Which one was that? I say so many profound things it's easy to lose
track. (not forget, mind you, I never forget.) :-)
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.
NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why 5 to 6?
|
| (...) It was the statement where you were expounding on the many wise decisions LEGO made while designing/revising/perfecting the brick system. You mentioned the "mystical 5:6 ratio". Steve (25 years ago, 2-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why 5 to 6?
|
| (...) Umm, because it allows you to create a nanofig-scale Borg spaceship, out of just three parts? (...) Yep, that geometry can get annoying. (...) You've got me. Maybe the great prophet Larry will expand on his previous statement. My *feeling* is (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
