To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 5898
5897  |  5899
Subject: 
Re: Why 5 to 6?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Fri, 30 Jul 1999 15:03:51 GMT
Viewed: 
2858 times
  
On Thu, 29 Jul 1999 23:06:30 GMT, "Robert Munafo"
<munafo@gcctechNO.SPAMcom> wrote:

> Why is the 5-to-6 ratio supposed to be such a great thing?

Umm, because it allows you to create a nanofig-scale Borg spaceship, out of
just three parts?

> I still think that a
> 5-to-5 or 6-to-6 ratio (better known as 1-to-1) would have been much better. It
> would, for example, make it much easier to build things at right angles to
> other things and have it all line up.

Yep, that geometry can get annoying.

> I'm usually pretty smart, but this issue still has me guessing.

You've got me.  Maybe the great prophet Larry will expand on his previous
statement.

My *feeling* is that a 1:1 system would too much like kiddy-blocks.  You
know, some weenie building system that no one wants to touch?

Also, the chosen dimensions allow a 2x4 brick to look more like a
real-world brick.  Which was probably a big deal when the whole system was
designed.

Steve



Message has 4 Replies:
  Re: Why 5 to 6?
 
(...) Uh? If we had a 1-1 ratio wouldn't you be able to create a Borg spaceship out of just one brick? :) Simon (URL) (27 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)
  Re: Why 5 to 6?
 
(...) Hey, yeah! (And Robert should know that :-) (URL) (27 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)
  Re: Why 5 to 6?
 
(...) This sounds like an excellent answer to me. However, what _are_ the dimensions of a real-world brick, and why? Paul (27 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)
  Re: Why 5 to 6?
 
(...) Which one was that? I say so many profound things it's easy to lose track. (not forget, mind you, I never forget.) :-) (27 years ago, 2-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Why 5 to 6?
 
Why is the 5-to-6 ratio supposed to be such a great thing? I still think that a 5-to-5 or 6-to-6 ratio (better known as 1-to-1) would have been much better. It would, for example, make it much easier to build things at right angles to other things (...) (27 years ago, 29-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)

37 Messages in This Thread:













Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR