Subject:
|
Re: Lego mentioned on Slashdot
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 30 Jul 1999 14:57:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
768 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999 02:28:41 GMT, cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com (Mike Stanley)
wrote:
> Well, after reading the part that DID inspire the post (the few geeks
> debating the trademark) I decided to go back and grab the url for the
> entire thread, thinking some people might not be familiar with
> Slashdot and not be able to find the rest.
My apologies. That scrolling-down thingy gets me everytime.
(note to Todd: LUGNET's interface is much better than slashdot's)
> It's all essentially about Lego, right? Would you have rather I not
> posted it at all?
No, I'm glad you posted it. I just missed the 'lego vs legos' part of what
you pointed to.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lego mentioned on Slashdot
|
| (...) Well, after reading the part that DID inspire the post (the few geeks debating the trademark) I decided to go back and grab the url for the entire thread, thinking some people might not be familiar with Slashdot and not be able to find the (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
