Subject:
|
Re: Why 5 to 6?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 4 Aug 1999 02:59:29 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
johnneal@uswest.+stopspammers+net
|
Viewed:
|
1191 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
This is fascinating stuff, and although I am too lazy to appreciate the math:-p,
I found a site that graphically depicts a golden rectangle at work:
http://www.vashti.net/mceinc/goldsqre.htm
Now *that's* some weird wild stuff;-)
-John
Robert Munafo wrote:
> Well, as you discovered, 5:6 isn't close to the Golden Ratio, but it's still a
> good idea. Perhaps you were thinking of 10:6, the aspect ratio of the "end"
> face of a 2x4 brick, which is fairly close to the Golden Ratio.
>
> In lugnet.general, David Leese writes:
> > I know it's not the answer you were expecting, but 5:6 is close
> > to the 'golden ratio' used by the Greeks/Romans in their architecture.
> > They discovered/deduced that the ratio of 1:1.6 has a certain
> > mathematical beauty (I *wish* I could remember the derivation);
>
> The derivation is:
>
> 1 + phi = 1 / phi
>
> where "phi" is the Golden Ratio. This has the effect that if you take a Golden
> rectangle and remove a square, the remaining part is a smaller Golden
> rectangle.
>
> > and 1/1.6 = 0.625 while 5/6 = 0.833. I know it doesn't look close,
> > but trust me, it's close enough to bring about a certain feel-good
> > factor.... ish.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Why 5 to 6?
|
| Thanks for posting that URL, John. When I got back into LEGO and began to realize the geometry, the first thing I did was to compare LEGO parts with the Golden Rectangle. Being an architect I was pleased to see that the LEGO geometry is indeed very (...) (25 years ago, 7-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Why 5 to 6?
|
| (...) I know it's not the answer you were expecting, but 5:6 is close to the 'golden ratio' used by the Greeks/Romans in their architecture. They discovered/deduced that the ratio of 1:1.6 has a certain mathematical beauty (I *wish* I could remember (...) (25 years ago, 2-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
37 Messages in This Thread: ![Re: MSP Fest? -Bram Lambrecht (11-Jan-99 to lugnet.build)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![The virtues of the 1x1 with side stud (was Re: MSP Fest? -Larry Pieniazek (11-Jan-99 to lugnet.build)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: The virtues of the 1x1 with side stud (was Re: MSP Fest? -Fred Carcanague III (11-Jan-99 to lugnet.build)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Customized pieces (was: Re: The virtues of the 1x1 with side stud) -Stephen Jacquot (16-Jan-99 to lugnet.build, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Customized pieces (was: Re: The virtues of the 1x1 with side stud) -Tim McSweeney (17-Jan-99 to lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Customized pieces (was: Re: The virtues of the 1x1 with side stud) -James Brown (17-Jan-99 to lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Customized pieces (was: Re: The virtues of the 1x1 with side stud) -Jasper Janssen (18-Jan-99 to lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Customized pieces (was: Re: The virtues of the 1x1 with side stud) -Stephen Jacquot (19-Jan-99 to lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Customized pieces (was: Re: The virtues of the 1x1 with side stud) -Jasper Janssen (19-Jan-99 to lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Customized pieces (was: Re: The virtues of the 1x1 with side stud) -Stephen Jacquot (20-Jan-99 to lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Customized pieces (was: Re: The virtues of the 1x1 with side stud) -Jasper Janssen (20-Jan-99 to lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Customized pieces (was: Re: The virtues of the 1x1 with side stud) -Gary Louie (23-Jan-99 to lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Customized pieces (was: Re: The virtues of the 1x1 with side stud) -Larry Pieniazek (23-Jan-99 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: The virtues of the 1x1 with side stud (was Re: MSP Fest? -Bram Lambrecht (11-Jan-99 to lugnet.build)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: The virtues of the 1x1 with side stud (was Re: MSP Fest? -Larry Pieniazek (11-Jan-99 to lugnet.build)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Why 5 to 6? -Robert Munafo (29-Jul-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Why 5 to 6? -Simon Robinson (29-Jul-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Why 5 to 6? -Fredrik Glöckner (30-Jul-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why 5 to 6? -Eric Brok (9-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why 5 to 6? -Fredrik Glöckner (9-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why 5 to 6? -Eric Brok (10-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Why 5 to 6? -Steve Bliss (30-Jul-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Why 5 to 6? -Simon Robinson (30-Jul-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why 5 to 6? -Christopher Masi (30-Jul-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why 5 to 6? -David Leese (2-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Why 5 to 6? -Robert Munafo (3-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why 5 to 6? -John Matthews (7-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Why 5 to 6? -Todd Lehman (30-Jul-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Why 5 to 6? -Paul Baulch (31-Jul-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why 5 to 6? -John Matthews (31-Jul-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why 5 to 6? -Steve Bliss (1-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Why 5 to 6? -Larry Pieniazek (2-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why 5 to 6? -Steve Bliss (2-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why 5 to 6? -Larry Pieniazek (2-Aug-99 to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: The virtues of the 1x1 with side stud (was Re: MSP Fest? -Terry Keller (11-Jan-99 to lugnet.build)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: The virtues of the 1x1 with side stud -Bram Lambrecht (11-Jan-99 to lugnet.build)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|