 | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —J. Spencer Rezkalla
|
| | | (...) I think it's more an issue that they don't want to produce toys that look like they can be used to emulate the modern warfare that they see on the news and such. Nobody fights with bi-planes anymore, but fighter jets are pretty much fighter (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —Mark Riley
|
| | | | | (...) The U.S. Navy has apparently decommissioned all of its battleships: (URL) any other navies have battleships, or is the battleship pretty much obsolete nowadays? Mark Note: Still no generic lugnet.off-topic group to send this to... :-( (21 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —Ahui Herrera
|
| | | | | | | (...) Mark there are NO more battleships in any navy in the world the last time I checked. The aircraft carrier replaced the battleship as the "main ship-of-war" in modern navies of the world. The only battleships you can still see/get on are those (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | | | (...) True. But the Soviets (and now the Russians) might disagree; the Kirov and her sisters? are sometimes classed as "battleships" or "battlecruisers." We in the US more often call them "very heavy cruisers" or "command ships." all best LFB (21 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —Steve Hickman
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Well actually, Russian/Soviet classifications of warships were slightly skewed to gain a 'numerical' superiority over the United States Navy. By announcing the construction of a battleship/battlecruiser, they could claim a superiority in (...) (21 years ago, 24-May-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | | | (...) But this is the US naval classification system (or perhaps Jane's)--and it is therefore that also used by those of us operating in retrospect. Remember that German battleships and battlecruisers in WWI (and in WWII--Scharnhorst and Gneisenau (...) (20 years ago, 24-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —Steve Hickman
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Very true. But, even the Germans considered the Gneisenau and Scharnhorst something called 'Pocket Battleships.' This was a peculiar way to present a ship that was greatly outclassed by BBs and BCs. The Germans could thus claim Naval equality (...) (20 years ago, 24-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | | | (...) The "pocket battleships" (literally Panzerschiffen, or armor-clads) you're thinking of were Deutschland (later Lützow), Admiral Graf Spee (of the River Plate, and which a private company is talking about raising and restoring (!!!!)), and (...) (20 years ago, 24-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —Steve Hickman
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Doh! Right you are! My mistake. The Gneisenau and Scharnhorst were definitely of the battle cruiser type vessel, in that they were built in response to the Invincibles and later Indefatigables. Interestingly, the Germans never really fully (...) (20 years ago, 24-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I think they did actually use Schlachtkreuzer at some point-- Breyer at least suggests that they did, but you do see Panzerkreuzer and Grosser Kreuzer used as well. (Imagine the s-tsett there, I cannot remember the ANSI number for it.) But it (...) (20 years ago, 25-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —David Laswell
|
| | | | | | (...) They didn't have much choice in the matter. The main guns have to be fed ammo in a specific sequence to compensate for changes in gun barrel geometry due to heat from firing the previous round(s). Rumor is that they've just been working (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —David Laswell
|
| | | | | (...) The way I've heard it is that they don't produce any weapons developed in the 20th century or later, and that the only reason why we have the Sopwith/Red Baron pair is because LEGO Direct operates under slightly different rules when developing (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —Ahui Herrera
|
| | | | | | (...) I don't think TLC will even do such a thing! But that has not stopped others from doing it already. Like this guy: (7 URLs) In addition there has been at least 1 instance that I know on ebay in which someone (do not remember the name and (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —Neb Okla
|
| | | | "J. Spencer Rezkalla" <srezkall@peoplepc.com> wrote in message news:Hy554B.13Fw@lugnet.com... (...) want (...) toy and (...) like (...) and (...) much (...) battleships. Note that set 4403 (Air Blazers) includes instructions for what would best be (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Weapons in models (was Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) True. See also the Patriot Jet, circa 1996: (URL) a modern "fighter jet". It just doesn't have any weapons. Does the 4403 model have visible weapons? if not, it doesn't undercut the argument (although it slices pretty close if you ask me) that (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Weapons in models (was Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —Neb Okla
|
| | | | | "Larry Pieniazek" <larry.(mylastname)@...areDOTcom> wrote in message news:Hy5Gws.G7A@lugnet.com... (...) look like (...) news and (...) much (...) best (...) 4403 (...) if you (...) Many modern fighter/bomber aircraft do not have visible weapons (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Weapons in models (was Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) It's not *my* reasoning. It's my speculation about *their* reasoning. If you want to infer what I think, think about "slices pretty close"... and what I meant by that.:-) (...) I could (facetiously) argue the point, in that since they mass (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Weapons in models (was Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —J. Spencer Rezkalla
|
| | | | (...) Hmm, I guess weaponry might be a pre-req then? For some reason the Air Blazers chopper reminds me of the Coast Guard, even though there is another rescue chopper set. I've never seen the Patroit Jet, but it does answer one question for me: (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | |
