Subject:
|
Re: Fast-paced photo montage (13,000 photos in 9 minutes)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 08:52:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2989 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Stefan van Zwam wrote:
> "Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message
> news:HsAs2w.Aru@lugnet.com...
> > In lugnet.events.brickfest, Todd Lehman wrote:
> > > (Hope you have fast net connection. :-)
> >
> > I do, you (or something along the way) don't. But at 146 kb/s I can't complain.
> >
> > Perhaps it would be an idea to compress it with Div-X?
>
> In this case, I don't believe it would matter that much. DivX (and all
> popular codecs, like RealVideo, XviD, WMV, ...) rely on the fact that there
> is a relation between subsequent frames. This is definitely not the case for
> this montage. A 480x480 JPEG image should be compressible in under 10,000
> bytes. Result: 13,000x10,000 = about 130 MB. Hmmm, looks like the largest
> version is still a factor 3 too large...
There are a lot of frames that are practically identical from the train layout.
--
Best regards,
/Tobbe
<http://www.lotek.nu>
(remove SPAM when e-mailing)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
