General Discussion : 45135


General / 45135	45134 \| 45136

Subject:	Re: Fast-paced photo montage (13,000 photos in 9 minutes)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.general
Date:	Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:16:33 GMT
Viewed:	1930 times

"Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message news:HsAs2w.Aru@lugnet.com... > In lugnet.events.brickfest, Todd Lehman wrote: > > (Hope you have fast net connection. :-) > > I do, you (or something along the way) don't. But at 146 kb/s I can't • complain. > > Perhaps it would be an idea to compress it with Div-X? In this case, I don't believe it would matter that much. DivX (and all popular codecs, like RealVideo, XviD, WMV, ...) rely on the fact that there is a relation between subsequent frames. This is definitely not the case for this montage. A 480x480 JPEG image should be compressible in under 10,000 bytes. Result: 13,000x10,000 = about 130 MB. Hmmm, looks like the largest version is still a factor 3 too large... Stefan.

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Fast-paced photo montage (13,000 photos in 9 minutes)
(...) There are a lot of frames that are practically identical from the train layout. (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Fast-paced photo montage (13,000 photos in 9 minutes)
(...) Arrrgh. Brain hurts. VERY cool though, don't know if it's intentional or not but the "movie" freezes on certain frames causing a very interesting effect. (...) Have still to do that, but I will. (...) I do, you (or something along the way) (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jan-04, to lugnet.general)

25 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search