| |
Dennis Clark wrote:
> OK, lets not make a mountain out of a molehill here. LEGO very clearly and
> often stated in that letter that they encourage the creation and use of our
> third party OS's and such. What they (rightly) wish to protect is the
> dillution of their brand. Brand law clearly requires the owning company
> be responsible for policing use of their brand. LEGO is being CONSIDERABLY
> nicer about this than other companies have been!
> There just isn't anything to gripe about in the LEGO stance. Their
> understanding of the current circumstance is quite laudable. So lets not
> start a fight where no fight has been asked for.
Dennis,
I do agree that Lego has been very nice about this; in my first post, I
stated that their stance on these matters was one of the things that
rekindled my Lego addiction. I admired their action (or lack thereof) as
far as Mindstorms was concerned. They have now cleared this all up;
they want to change the names of some software. It is laudable, indeed
that they have decided not to force any change on current versions, but
rather from next version. That is (no irony intended) a great way to
deal with this in my opinion. Hopefully they will continue on this
route, as its shows a great respect for the consumer.
Regards,
Stelios
--
| Stelios Kalogreades / http://www.kalogreades.com |
|ACM SIGCHI |IEEE Member/ Team AMIGA member |
| H.F.E.S. Member /Amiga Translators Organization|
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
